Re: [STDS-802-16] comment #30
That's ok, Bob. But I do wish you all will take a look at this new version
before next deadline, i.e., May 4th.
Lei
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nelson [mailto:bob_nelson@IEEE.ORG]
Sent: April 30, 2004 3:57 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] comment #30
I'm going home....
I meant to say we have to consider C802.16d-04/88.
not the new version, C802.16d-04/88r3
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bob Nelson
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:42 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] comment #30
Lei,
Thank for the info and the work to complete the change. However, as
things stand now, I believe we have to vote on the contents of the
document you specified in the database, C802.16d-04/88r3, not this
latest revision.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Lei Wang
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:23 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] comment #30
Dear BRC members,
Please note that there is a version of contribution C802.16d-04/88r3 in
the upload directory, which provides the supplementary changes for the
comment #30.
Lei