Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [STDS-802-16] [PREAMBLE] reasonings for OMI
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
Hi
Jiho,
I have
some comments on your assumptions per your points:
1) As
you stated FUSC uses all bandwidth but so can the PUSC, so you may trade
BW/footprint and Interference as you like.
2) I
am not sure the O-FUSC meets all the spectral masks (I am not sure such an
analyses has been done, or at lease
I
didn't see any), and it is gets very hard implementing these much carriers
(more processing in some digital mechanisms
due to
so much used BW). But if I am wrong then you are right.
3) The
assumption of the hit probability must be between subchannels but if you use all
the spectrum, you are hitting all
subcarriers all the time anyway (and I am not sure that the hit
probability will be such a factor in this case - where different
permutations
will
be used for the PUSC zones, excluding the first 2 symbols).
4)
Diversity gain difference is very small as the PUSC already has clusters
scattered all over the spectrum, the difference will be between 24
clusters each with 2 subcarriers and 48
individual subcarriers.
And in
any case you can switch zones just after the first 2 PUSC symbols, which
are heavily coded, has better S/N and better
foot
print when used in the 1/3 configuration.
Regards,
Yossi
Hi all,
I'm Jiho Jang from Samsung Electronics.
I have uploaded a material which describes the reasoning for the proposal
of OMI (operating mode identification) for your information on
http://temp.wirelessman.org.
Please find the uploaded file and look it over. Thanks.
Regards,
Jiho Jang
|
Jiho Jang (Ph. D)
NTP Development Team (System Lab. 2)
Telecommunication System Division
Telecommunication Network
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
T. 82-31-279-3355
M. 016-9233-8541
jiho.jang@samsung.com
|