Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] voting on leftover P802.16-REVe/D5 Sponsor Ballot comment resolutions



Here is a table of all the contributions I could find referenced
among the comments under consideration in the poll.

The first column is the contribution number as referenced in the comment.
The second column is the current revision of the contribution, which
is the one under consideration in the poll. The third column lists
the comments that reference the contribution:

Contrib Ref        Cur    Comment
C802.16e-04/283    283    1578
C802.16e-04/345r4  345r5  0249
C802.16e-04/361    361    1606
C802.16e-04/408    408    1974L
C802.16e-04/412    412r2  1975L
C802.16e-04/413    413r3  0982
C802.16e-04/419    419    0226
C802.16e-04/462    462    0248
C802.16e-04/463r1  463r1  0981*
C802.16e-04/485    485    0909
C802.16e-04/500    500r2  1789
C802.16e-04/503    503    0571
C802.16e-04/508    508r1  1260
C802.16e-04/511    511r1  1028
C802.16e-04/512    512r1  1027
C802.16e-04/520    520    1965
C802.16e-04/521    521r1  0912
C802.16e-04/526    526r1  1605
C802.16e-04/528    528r2  1544
C802.16e-04/529    529r5  1553,1554
C802.16e-04/530    530r4  1565
C802.16e-04/532    532r3  1527
C802.16e-04/538    538    0635,0637,0878,0881
C802.16e-04/547    547r1  1220
C802.16e-04/549    none   0032**

*Comment refers to "C80216-04_463r1.pdf; let's assume it meant
"C80216e-04_463r1.pdf".
**No contribution exists with this number.

Roger

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:11 PM
>To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] voting on leftover P802.16-REVe/D5 Sponsor
>Ballot comment resolutions
>
>Vladimir:
>
>1. We will assume that the comment is referring to the most recent
>revision submitted prior to the close of Session #34.
>
>2. All of the TGe contributions (except those rejected for procedural
>reasons) have been indexed and filed here:
>         http://ieee802.org/16/tge/index.html#Contributions
>The TGe upload server is now empty.
>
>3. There is no procedure to indicate your views regarding a comment,
>other than to indicate Accepted or Rejected. If a comment is
>approved, the Editor will implement it in any way that is consistent
>with the comment and remedy. If the remedy offers options, then the
>Editor has options. If you think this gives the Editor too much
>leeway, then the comment is probably one that you should consider
>marking Rejected. Any remaining concerns can be addressed in
>recirculation.
>
>Roger
>
>
>At 09:30 +0200 2004-11-23, Vladimir Yanover wrote:
>>Roger,
>>
>>Can you please clarify the following:
>>1. Many comments refer to contributions. Which version of contributions
>>should be addressed?
>>2. Where relevant contributions are [will be] stored?
>>3. Some comments / contributions suggest two possible resolutions e.g.
>"do X
>>or delete section Y"
>>Suppose that I prefer X. How should I mark such comment?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Vladimir
>>
>>=========================================
>>Dr. Vladimir Yanover
>>Standards Strategy Director
>>Alvarion Ltd.
>>21 A   Habarzel St. Ramat - Hahayal
>>Tel - Aviv 69710 P.O. Box 13139, Tel-Aviv 61131, Israel
>>Tel.:      +972-36457834
>>Fax:       +972-36456290
>>E-Mail:   vladimir.yanover@alvarion.com
>>===============================
>>
>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>   From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 1:26 AM
>  >>  Subject: voting on leftover P802.16-REVe/D5 Sponsor Ballot
>>>   comment resolutions
>>>
>>>
>>>   Last week, the 802.16 WG Closing Plenary passed a motion (by vote of
>>>   91-0-0) "to accept IEEE 802.16-04/69r2, plus the results of an
>>>   electronic poll of the ballot resolution committee, as a partial
>>>   resolution of Sponsor Ballot comments, develop Draft P802.16e/D5a
>>>   based on those resolutions, and initiate ballot resolution committee
>>>   recirculation on D5a."
>>>
>>>   The full comment database IEEE 802.16-04/69r2 is posted at:
>>>       <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_69r2.zip>
>  >>
>>>   This note provides the instructions for participating in the poll on
>>>   the resolution of the remaining 427 comments that were not resolved
>>>   during the session. These comments, which are the only comments
>>>   subject to this poll, have been extracted into a separate database
>>>   IEEE 802.16-04/75:
>>>       <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_75.zip>
>>>
>>>   The process works this way:
>>>
>>>   (1) Only Working Group members <http://ieee802.org/16/members.html>
>>>   are eligible.
>>>
>>>   (2) Open the Commentary database
>>>   <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_75.zip>. Type your name in
>>>   the "Recommendation by" field.
>>>
>>>   (3) With the cursor in the "Recommendation by" field, choose
>>>   "Replace" (under the menu item "Records") to put your name in the
>>>   "Recommendation by" of EVERY marked comment. Check to make sure it
>>>   worked.
>>>
>>>   (4) For each comment, use the "Recommendation" field to cast your
>>>   vote. The choices will be interpreted this way:
>>>
>>>         "Accepted"      => Vote to approve the comment as it stands
>>>         "Rejected"      => Vote to disapprove the comment as it stands
>>>          Anything else  => Vote to abstain on the issue of that
>comment
>>>       ***For example: "Accepted-modified" will be counted as
>>>   "abstain"***
>>>
>>>   All other fields will be ignored.
>>>
>>>   (5) When you have finished, make sure you are showing all 427
>>>   comments (see the count in the grey area on the left) and no more.
>>>   Then, under the menu item "Scripts," choose "Export Clause Editor's
>>>   Proposals."
>>>
>>>   (6) Select the file type "FilerMaker Pro Runtime". Name the file in
>>>   the format "16ePoll_Name.USR", where "Name" is a your name, in a
>>   > recognizable format. Save the file.
>>>
>>>   (7) Upload the file before the deadline (see (8)) to
>>>       http://tgeballot.wirelessman.org
>>>
>>>   (8) The deadline is 3 December AOE:
>>>       http://tinyurl.com/4uj5c
>>>
>>>   (9) A report showing the individual responses of the individual
>>>   members will be posted to the IEEE 802.16 password-protected web
>site.
>>>
>>>   (10) Comments with approval ratio of at least 75% (computed from
>>>   Approve and Disapprove votes collected on each comment) will be
>>>   marked "Accepted" and sent to the editor for incorporation. Other
>>>   comments will be marked "Rejected." Comment resolutions, both from
>>>   the meeting and from the poll, are subject to recirculation
>>>   requirements.
>>>
>>>   Please let me know if you have any problems with or questions about
>>>   the process.
>>>
>>>   Regards,
>>>
>>>   Roger
>>>
>>>   --
>>>
>>>   Dr. Roger B. Marks  <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 7837
>>>   National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA
>>>   Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
>>   >         <http://WirelessMAN.org>