Re: [STDS-802-16] IEEE 802.16e D9

[Mehul Mehta <MMEHTA@ALTERA.COM>]

I agree with Amir, I think the next draft from the 16e working group should incorporate the changes (corrections) made in the maintenance group, i.e., D3 (or whatever is the latest).

 

Point well made!

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Mehul Mehta ('Micky')
Member of Technical Staff
System Solutions Group - Wireless
Altera European Technology Centre
Holmers Farm Way
High Wycombe
Buckinghamshire
HP12 4XF
Tel: +44 (0)1494 602000
Tel: +44 (0)1494 602317 (direct)
Fax: +44 (0)1494 602301
http://www.altera.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

From: owner-stds-802-16@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-16@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Amir Kamalizad
Sent: 27 July 2005 19:41
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] IEEE 802.16e D9

Hello there,

 

In the preface of IEEE 802.16e D9 it is written that this is an amendment to IEEE 802.16-2004. However, there were a lot of issues that were fixed in IEEE 802.16 Corr1 D3 which are not imported in D9. Should one amend D9 to Corr1 D3? An example would be writing the slots frequency first, or Fast feedback channel allocation as a block. There are also a lot of inconsistencies in the length of extended UIUC and the CDMA allocation IE.

 

Regards,

Amir