[STDS-802-16] please review revised comment resolutions
In regard to the 802.16e comment resolutions,
Please note that Phil Barber is proposing
resolutions to comments 8006, 8009, 8011, 8012,
8014, 8015, 8016, 8040, and 8044 (which he calls
"Comment Late 1") in IEEE C802.16e-05/404r1:
http://tge.wirelessman.org
Phil has revised his proposals in response to
other reply comments received. He believes that
his revisions address the other reply comments
and provide a harmonized result. I very much
appreciate Phil's efforts on this.
Please take a look at Phil's proposals and let
him (and the rest of us) know of any concerns. As
you have seen, he plans to update his proposals
tonight.
We are still open to input regarding the other
comments as well. We plan to complete a set of
comment resolutions by October 12, so we would
appreciate any input by October 11.
Roger
>Absolutely correct. I am afraid I made those
>couple of errors transcribing the equation in
>8.4.6.1.2.2 into the proper format. There was
>not intent to change the equation from the
>revised equation in 16e/D11, just put it into
>the proper format. I have corrected the error
>and have a revised document C802.16e-05/404r2
>which I am currently holding pending receiving
>any other comments indicating errors in 404r1. I
>will upload the revised 404r2 at the end of
>business today PST.
>
>Thanks,
>Phillip Barber
>Huawei
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: <mailto:jaeweon.cho@samsung.com>JaeWeon Cho
>To: <mailto:STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:58 PM
>Subject: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1
>
>Phillip,
>
>I have just one comment on your reply comment (to #8025) in 404r1.
>
>#8025, Remedy 16. (i.e. replacing the equation in line 15-18, page 426)
>I don’t agree with this proposed change.
> The number of clusters (i.e.
>Nclusters) is ‘120’ in Cor1, but it varies with
>FFT sizes in 16e.
> So, the current equation in 16e/D11
>cannot be replaced with that in Cor1/D5.
> If the remedy 16 in 404r1 is just
>for better looking of the equation,
> ‘120’ shall be replaced with ‘Ncluster’ in the equation and
>‘All SC indicator = 0’ with ‘Use All AC Indicator = 0’ (typo in Cor1.)
>
>I agree with the other reply comments in 404r1.
>
>Thank you.
>Jaeweon.
>