Re: [STDS-802-16] please review revised comment resolutions
I received no additional comments regarding my remedy document and have
uploaded it to the TGe upload server as C802.16e-05/404r2 at
http://dot16.org/CSUpload//upload/TGe_db/C80216e%2d05_404r2.pdf
The only change from 404r1 is correction to the equation figure for Remedy
16.
Thanks to many Members for their helpful comments and criticisms in the
construction of these remedies.
Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Huawei
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
To: <STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject: [STDS-802-16] please review revised comment resolutions
> In regard to the 802.16e comment resolutions, Please note that Phil Barber
> is proposing resolutions to comments 8006, 8009, 8011, 8012, 8014, 8015,
> 8016, 8040, and 8044 (which he calls "Comment Late 1") in IEEE
> C802.16e-05/404r1:
> http://tge.wirelessman.org
>
> Phil has revised his proposals in response to other reply comments
> received. He believes that his revisions address the other reply comments
> and provide a harmonized result. I very much appreciate Phil's efforts on
> this.
>
> Please take a look at Phil's proposals and let him (and the rest of us)
> know of any concerns. As you have seen, he plans to update his proposals
> tonight.
>
> We are still open to input regarding the other comments as well. We plan
> to complete a set of comment resolutions by October 12, so we would
> appreciate any input by October 11.
>
> Roger
>
>
>>Absolutely correct. I am afraid I made those couple of errors transcribing
>>the equation in 8.4.6.1.2.2 into the proper format. There was not intent
>>to change the equation from the revised equation in 16e/D11, just put it
>>into the proper format. I have corrected the error and have a revised
>>document C802.16e-05/404r2 which I am currently holding pending receiving
>>any other comments indicating errors in 404r1. I will upload the revised
>>404r2 at the end of business today PST.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Phillip Barber
>>Huawei
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>From: <mailto:jaeweon.cho@samsung.com>JaeWeon Cho
>>To: <mailto:STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>>Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:58 PM
>>Subject: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1
>>
>>Phillip,
>>
>>I have just one comment on your reply comment (to #8025) in 404r1.
>>
>>#8025, Remedy 16. (i.e. replacing the equation in line 15-18, page 426)
>>I don't agree with this proposed change.
>> The number of clusters (i.e. Nclusters) is '120' in Cor1,
>> but it varies with FFT sizes in 16e.
>> So, the current equation in 16e/D11 cannot be replaced with
>> that in Cor1/D5.
>> If the remedy 16 in 404r1 is just for better looking of the
>> equation,
>> '120' shall be replaced with 'Ncluster' in the equation and
>>'All SC indicator = 0' with 'Use All AC Indicator = 0' (typo in Cor1.)
>>
>>I agree with the other reply comments in 404r1.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>Jaeweon.
>>
>