Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1

Hi Phillip,

 

I am fine with your reply comments on 8006 and 8040.

 

Regards,

Jungnam Yun

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Barber [mailto:pbarber@BROADBANDMOBILETECH.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:47 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1

 

Absolutely correct. I am afraid I made those couple of errors transcribing the equation in 8.4.6.1.2.2 into the proper format. There was not intent to change the equation from the revised equation in 16e/D11, just put it into the proper format. I have corrected the error and have a revised document C802.16e-05/404r2 which I am currently holding pending receiving any other comments indicating errors in 404r1. I will upload the revised 404r2 at the end of business today PST.

 

Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Huawei

 

----- Original Message -----

From: JaeWeon Cho

Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:58 PM

Subject: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1

 

Phillip,

 

I have just one comment on your reply comment (to #8025) in 404r1.

 

#8025, Remedy 16. (i.e. replacing the equation in line 15-18, page 426)

I don’t agree with this proposed change.

             The number of clusters (i.e. Nclusters) is ‘120’ in Cor1, but it varies with FFT sizes in 16e.

             So, the current equation in 16e/D11 cannot be replaced with that in Cor1/D5.

             If the remedy 16 in 404r1 is just for better looking of the equation,

         ‘120’ shall be replaced with ‘Ncluster’ in the equation and

‘All SC indicator = 0’ with ‘Use All AC Indicator = 0’ (typo in Cor1.)

 

I agree with the other reply comments in 404r1.

 

Thank you.

Jaeweon.