Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[STDS-802-16] Inconsistency in 6.3.17 MAC support for HARQ

To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Inconsistency in 6.3.17 MAC support for HARQ
From: Dyson Ye <dysonye@GMAIL.COM>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:54:43 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=L4qlzkUJi+52Xr0GlvXzSzXRNix06cH2I70DP5VUFKhmy0BcsUUoHk0gKiypER4cFjGDH6NxXfbRBq28vSvpu3NtwbGyWVfY+QSQtfVerqJCPAUmxbpMSoH0zCVh3dlzm4wLzpHE21/pn/oEZSa/FeqDFtAKFv2CyvX0RSPDVyE=
Reply-To: Dyson Ye <dysonye@GMAIL.COM>

There seems to be an inconsistency in section 6.3.17 of 802.16e/D12 --- In the 1st paragraph, it says SS shall support per-terminal implementation and MS shall support per-connection implementation. In the 3rd paragraph before the end, it simply says "HARQ is enabled on a CID basis" without distinguishing them.

Which is the correct requirement for SS?

Prev by Date: [STDS-802-16] Inconsistency between sections 6.3.17.1 and 6.3.17.2
Next by Date: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: IEEE 802 MARCH 2006 PLENARY SESSION - Rooms & Registration
Prev by thread: [STDS-802-16] Inconsistency between sections 6.3.17.1 and 6.3.17.2
Next by thread: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: IEEE 802 MARCH 2006 PLENARY SESSION - Rooms & Registration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread