[STDS-802-16] Can both H-ARQ MAP message and SUB-DL-UL-MAP message be valid?
- To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
- Subject: [STDS-802-16] Can both H-ARQ MAP message and SUB-DL-UL-MAP message be valid?
- From: Dyson Ye <dysonye@GMAIL.COM>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:42:40 -0800
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qvn+ggHjCxDVbxuPpFtnS0JOTyBwjqZs3h+g/AX1POQUAreA+kY58vEJkqFBxepNiy0sCuvQ33saGDfn2PUluHq9bW3vxGipFx1x+9sEddkIMYAh3o0Fp3YY4BghUUZFPsxLeSLkAlelv2RToLgD3M7I2gbTCLL5pjuLHW2ILuI=
- Reply-To: Dyson Ye <dysonye@GMAIL.COM>
Both H-ARQ MAP message (Table 88) and SUB-DL-UL-MAP message (Table 108y) are indicated by the first 3 bits of a burst being 0b111. How can the receiver tell which is which, then?
It seems they contain very similar contents. Is SUB-DL-UL-MAP supposed to be a replacement for H-ARQ MAP?
(I'd be very appreciative if someone can point me to an expert on H-ARQ --- I have more questions on H-ARQ that I would like to ask off the list. Many thanks!)