[STDS-802-16] Comments received on proposed 802.16j PAR
Dear EC,
The IEEE 802.16 Working Group Study Group on Mobile Multihop Relay
has considered all of the comments in the summary noted yesterday,
plus a few late ones. Some of those submitting comments accepted the
invitation to participate in the resolution.
The comment resolutions are available here:
Comments received on proposed 802.16j PAR
IEEE 802.16mmr-06/007r1
http://wirelessman.org/sg/mmr/docs/80216mmr-06_007r1.pdf or
http://lan.wirelessman.org/16/sg/mmr/docs/80216mmr-06_007r1.pdf
The Five Criteria statement has not changed. The draft PAR has been
revised in accordance with the comment resolutions. The new draft PAR
and Five Criteria are available here:
Draft P802.16j PAR and Five Criteria: Mobile Multihop Reply
IEEE 802.16mmr-06/002r1
http://wirelessman.org/sg/mmr/docs/80216mmr-06_002r1.pdf or
http://lan.wirelessman.org/16/sg/mmr/docs/80216mmr-06_002r1.pdf
Please note that the revised draft PAR shows some change marks. The
changes shown are with respect to the following contribution:
Proposed Editorial Update to 802.16j PAR Proposal
IEEE 802.16mmr-06/016
http://wirelessman.org/sg/mmr/contrib/C80216mmr-06_016.pdf or
http://lan.wirelessman.org/16/sg/mmr/contrib/C80216mmr-06_016.pdf
Regards,
Roger
>I have posted the file:
> Comments received on proposed 802.16j PAR
> IEEE 802.16mmr-06/007
> http://ieee802.org/16/sg/mmr/docs/80216mmr-06_007.pdf
>
>This contains all the comments that, to my knowledge, have been
>submitted in regard to the proposed 802.16j PAR. The MMR Study Group
>will be reviewing and responding to these comments on 8 March 2006.
>
>To the comment submitters: If I have missed, or misrepresented, any
>comments, please let me know. You are invited to discuss your
>comments with the Mobile Multihop Relay Study Group. If you would
>like to so this, please contact the SG Chair, Mistuo Nohara
><mi-nohara@kddi.com>.
>
>Roger