Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Relay availability

To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Relay availability
From: Matty Levanda <Mattyl@WINETWORKS.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:34:24 +0200
List-Help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-16>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO STDS-802-16>
List-Owner: <mailto:STDS-802-16-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-16-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-16-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-To: Matty Levanda <Mattyl@WINETWORKS.COM>
Thread-Index: AcZ/zaV1r7zDM/uASK6BJq9lvaayIA==
Thread-Topic: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Relay availability

Title: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Relay availability

Dear all,

I suggest adding to Jerry's TOC, in Section 7 - RS Characteristics, the 'Relay availability' subsection.

We are probably not going for the 5 9's, but still the availability has a major effect on the usage models.

We need to decide what kind of redundancy we want to add into each relay type and what kind of availability we can provide by deploying more (redundant) relays.

Best regards,

Matty

Prev by Date: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: ***SEC Five Day Review*** RR-TAG Comments on FCC RM-11325, Amendment of Amateur Service Rules
Next by Date: Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Announcing First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group
Prev by thread: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: ***SEC Five Day Review*** RR-TAG Comments on FCC RM-11325, Amendment of Amateur Service Rules
Next by thread: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Agenda for First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread