Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Agenda: -
Roll call -
Discuss points
raised in email discussion: -
Section 6.4 –
need to discuss again the level of detail that should be captured in this
section -
Section 6 in
general – is there any missing content? -
Section 5.3 –
proposal to specify that route selection is centralized (from Jen-Shun Yang) -
Discuss any other
technical comments on the current draft -
Access the status
of the draft – do we have consensus? -
Discuss next steps o
Proposals for
additional usage models? o
Wrapping up the
editing of the contribution From: Dear Ad Hoc participants, The next meeting of the Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group will occur on Thursday June 15, 06:00 – 08:00 PDT (13:00
– 15:00 UTC). The bridge for the meeting is 916-356-2663, Bridge: 1, Passcode:
4686427 I have updated the draft to include modifications to the
outline that we agreed to in the June 8 meeting. It can be found in the
following location: http://dot16.org/CSUpload//upload/temp_db/C80216j%2d06_UMAHtemp_r3a.doc
. Please take care to look at the r3a version of the document.
There is an r3 version that I had uploaded to the server, but I discovered that
I had not made all of the agreed upon modifications, so I created the r3a
version. My plan is to assemble a list of issues that we need to
resolve in the next meeting via email discussion before the meeting. Please
review the document and bring up issues that you have with the technical
content (or missing content) of the document. (Editorial comments are welcome,
but we may want to hold off on making editorial changes until we are sure that
we are not changing the technical content). Please send your comments to the list before Wednesday 08:00
PDT. I will assemble a list of issues for us to resolve based on the comments
received up to that point. Below is the tentative agenda for the meeting. I
will send out an updated agenda on Wednesday. -
Roll call -
Discuss points
raised in email discussion: -
Section 6.4 –
need to discuss again the level of detail that should be captured in this
section -
Section 6 in
general – is there any missing content? -
Discuss any other
technical comments on the current draft -
Access the status
of the draft – do we have consensus? -
Discuss proposals
for additional usage models -
Discuss next steps o
Proposals for
additional usage models? o
Wrapping up the
editing of the contribution |