Re: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Some comments for joint contributions of usage model
Hello,
IMO, We should not even have the section 5.3 "types of route" in the usage
model document. It does not add any value to the usage scenario, as
described in section 3.
Topology section (except 5.3) provide enough information and technical
solution about route, multiple route, fault tolerance, soft handover,
co-operative relay as stated in this section (5.3) has nothing to do with
usage model and should not be talk about in usage model document. It can be
discussed in either technical requirement or during solution discussion.
Best regards,
-shashi
On 6/14/06 7:18 PM, "ext Joseph Kim" <kyeongsoo.kim@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> Hello Jen-Shun.
>
> To me, your proposal is more or less related with the implementation aspects
> of
> routing protocols. Why should we ever mention such details -- i.e.,
> prohibition or
> enforcement of the use of certain types of protocol implementations --
> in this usage
> model document?
>
> Regards,
> Kyeongsoo (Joseph) Kim