Re: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] comment on Military Usage model

["Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM>]

I don’t believe the intent is to restrict usage in anyway.  It has been assumed that the ways in which the military applies these technologies may be different than for commercial applications.  The text is meant to be descriptive rather than restrictive.

 

Regards,

 

Mat

 

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, NES
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---

From: Sungjin Lee [mailto:steve.lee@samsung.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:02 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] comment on Military Usage model

 

Dear AH members,

 

For the Military usage model, I got a question just for clarification not a technical one.

 

1)       Are we going to accept the term ‘Military’ usage model?

2)       If yes, the model can be used only for the military purpose? and only operated by only military ?

 

If the model is only for the military, it may not need to be discussed in open manner and standardized as far as I know.

In that reason, I expect that Matt Sherman is not proposing that model only for the military purpose.

If so, why don’t we change the term ‘military’ to appropriate word?

Please let me know if I misunderstand/missing some points.

 

 

 

Best regards,

 

 

 

Sungjin Lee

 

Advanced Research Lab.
Global Standards & Research Team
Telecommunication R&D Center
Samsung Electronics

 

OFFICE : +82 31 279 5248
MOBILE : +82 11 223 6603
E-mail : steve.lee@samsung.com sj.lee@ieee.org