Re: [STDS-802-16] Handling of IEEE 802.16 Letter Ballot Recirc #23a
Dear Jungnam,
I was not referring to any secret contributions. I was referring only
to existing contributions.
Contributions from the upload server are moved to the permanent
archives. Look at the bottom of:
<http://maint.wirelessman.org>
You will see the following link:
"link to indexed document list"
<http://ieee802.org/16/maint/index.html#contrib>
This is where Maintenance TG contributions are filed.
You can find links to all of the TG pages here:
<http://ieee802.org/16/tgs.html>
Sorry this wasn't clear.
Roger
On Feb 26, 2007, at 04:06 PM, Jungnam Yun wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> Please check the upload websites - lb23.wirelessman.org or
> maint.wirelessman.org
> There are only 5 contributions at the upload site, contrary to your
> email
> saying that there are 17 contributions.
> Could you please make all 17 contributions visible to everyone so
> that we
> could review those contributions and write reply comments by tonight?
> I believe the deadline for the reply comments submission should be
> delayed
> until all contributions are uploaded for review.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jungnam Yun
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [STDS-802-16] Handling of IEEE 802.16 Letter Ballot Recirc
> #23a
>
> As previously reported, Letter Ballot Recirc #23a closed on 17
> February. At Session #47, the WG authorized the WG Chair to form a
> Ballot Resolution Committee to resolve the resulting comments and
> conduct another recirculation. Here is a report on the status of this
> situation.
>
> In the recirc, we received 81 comments and 17 uploaded contributions.
> Another 23 comments were uploaded on 18 February. I reviewed the
> situation with Maintenance TG Chair (Jon Labs) and the document's
> Editor (Joe Schumacher), considering the number and extent of the
> comments and the level of detail provided in the proposed remedies.
> We decided that it was not feasible to conduct a comment resolution
> in time for the creation of a new draft and the conduct of a second
> recirculation before Session #48. In order to make good use of the
> remaining time before Session #48, therefore, we have arranged a
> different approach.
>
> (1) We have posted 802.16-07/013r1:
> <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/07/80216-07_013r1.zip>
> which includes the 23 late comments. We will issue a Call for Reply
> Comments, due Feb 26 AOE.
>
> (2) We will issue a new Call for Comments, with a deadline of March 4
> AOE. New comments are welcome. However, we will particularly
> encourage comments that address previous
> comments and their replies.
>
> (3) We issue a second Call for Reply Comments, with a deadline of
> March 11.
>
>
> Here's an example of how we hope this will proceed in the three steps:
>
> (1) We receive a Reply Comment to Comment X. It explains that the
> remedy in Comment X is weak or incomplete. It might propose another
> solution.
>
> (2) We receive a brand new comment, Comment Y. It proposes a better
> or more complete solution than that proposed by Comment X. This
> solution may have been stimulated by a previous Reply Comment.
>
> (3) We receive a Reply Comment recommending that Comment X be marked
> as Superceded by Comment Y.
> We receive a Reply Comment saying that Comment Y should be
> accepted. Or maybe accepted-modified.
>
> By the time we get to the meeting, we hope to have a pretty clear
> picture of the views of the WG members. If this works as planned, the
> Maintenance TG should have a relatively easy job to reach consensus
> on the comment resolutions.
>
> Soon, I'll post a short note with the details of the first Call for
> Reply Comments (1).
>
> Roger
>
>
>
>> The recirc has closed:
>> <http://ieee802.org/16/maint/ballot23/report23.html>
>>
>> The Commentary database has 81 comments, from 13 people, and is at:
>> <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/07/80216-07_013.zip>
>>
>> The comments point to 17 uploaded contributions:
>> <http://maint.wirelessman.org>
>>
>> The comment resolution process has not yet been planned. In any
>> case, we will be open to reply comments, so feel free to develop
>> yours.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>>> The deadline for this ballot remains open until we reach the
>>> minimum return ratio.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>> IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot Recirc #23a:
>>>> <http://ieee802.org/16/maint/ballot23/report23.html>
>>>> is now open, through 16 February 2007 AOE <http://ieee802.org/16/
>>>> aoe.html>.
>>>>
>>>> The ballot concerns P802.16/Cor2/D2:
>>>> <http://ieee802.org/16/pubs/80216_Cor2.html>
>>>>
>>>> The recirc announcement document is:
>>>> Title: "IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #23a:
>>>> Announcement"
>>>> Document Number: IEEE 802.16-06/009
>>>> <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/07/80216-07_009.pdf>
>>>>
>>>> Since this is a recirculation, participation will not affect your
>>>> Working Group membership status. However, since no direct vote has
>>>> been taken on the 802.16/Cor2 draft, no previous votes are
>>>> available
>>>> to carry forward. Therefore, if you do not cast a ballot in this
>>>> recirculation, your vote will not be included in the Working Group
>>>> Letter Ballot #23 results.
>>>>
>>>> The ballot submission form is available at:
>>>> <http://dot16.org/ballot23/ballotform23a.html>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Roger
>
>