| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear all I uploaded to the "temp" directory an
Excel file with all the contributions uploaded so far, allocated according to
their designated topic in the "Re" field or my wild guess. Please
have a look and see if I missed any document or wrongly assigned them. Contributions
with problems are marked in red. A few more problems with contributions: 121: No specific topic allocation in the
"Re" field 126r1: Wrong document number in the header.
The base document (126) does not exist, but upload a corrected version as r2 174: No specific topic allocation in the "Re"
field. 181, 125: Wrong document number (should be
a C document, like the filename). Remove the editing instructions from the
cover page. 182: No "Re field, wrong abstract, no
"purpose". 191: It seems it is just a commentary file.
Any reason why was it uploaded as a contribution? Please export it to a *.cmtb
with the name tgmsdd_YourName.cmtb 196: Wrong document number in the header 201: Wrong document number in the header 217: Wrong document number in the header 227: No indication in the "Re" field to
which of the topics this contribution refers to Avi From: Avi Freedman
[mailto:avif@hexagonltd.com] Dear all, A new
batch of contributions has arrived in the TGm upload directory, ensuring us
that we are going to have, as usual, a wonderful busy time. Some of the
contributions have some problems. Please make an effort to fix them and upload
a corrected version. 120:
No specific topic in the "Re" Field. The "Re" field should
refer to a specific topic in the Call for Contributions. Read the instructions
in IEEE 802.16m-08/005 145,
146: No date, no RE field 147: The "Re" field should refer to the Call for
Contributions. Read the instructions in IEEE 802.16m-08/005 C802.16m-08/159r1 is identical to S802.16m-08/159. There is no
need for the "S" document in this case. In the document
C802.16m-08/159r1 the slide show template was wrongly used. There is no
"Re" field. The "Venue" field in the "S" document
is OK. The same applies to the pair S802.16m-08/137 and
C802.16m-08/137r1. S802.16m-08/170,171: The "base document" should be
C802.16m-08/170,171 The following documents don't seem to refer to the subject they
were allocated to in the "Re" field, or to any of the topics in the
CfC: 124, 137, 159, 170 Avi |