| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi
Avi,
Contribution 08/172 from Nortel addresses both
'pilot structure' and 'DL physical resource allocation'. Could
you please update the spreadsheet.
Best
regards,
Mo-Han
From: Avi Freedman [mailto:avif@HEXAGONLTD.COM] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:49 AM To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Contributionss Dear
all I uploaded to the
"temp" directory an Excel file with all the contributions uploaded so far,
allocated according to their designated topic in the "Re" field or my wild
guess. Please have a look and see if I missed any document or wrongly assigned
them. Contributions with problems are marked in
red. A few more problems
with contributions: 121: No specific topic
allocation in the "Re" field 126r1: Wrong
document number in the header. The base document (126) does not exist, but
upload a corrected version as r2 174: No specific topic
allocation in the "Re" field. 181, 125: Wrong
document number (should be a C document, like the filename). Remove the editing
instructions from the cover page. 182: No "Re
field, wrong abstract, no "purpose". 191: It seems it
is just a commentary file. Any reason why was it uploaded as a contribution?
Please export it to a *.cmtb with the name
tgmsdd_YourName.cmtb 196: Wrong
document number in the header 201: Wrong
document number in the header 217: Wrong document
number in the header 227: No indication in
the "Re" field to which of the topics this contribution refers
to Avi From: Avi
Freedman [mailto:avif@hexagonltd.com] Dear
all, A new batch of
contributions has arrived in the TGm upload directory, ensuring us that we are
going to have, as usual, a wonderful busy time. Some of the contributions have
some problems. Please make an effort to fix them and upload a corrected version.
120: No specific
topic in the "Re" Field. The "Re" field should refer to a specific topic in the
Call for Contributions. Read the instructions in IEEE
802.16m-08/005 145, 146: No date,
no RE field 147: The "Re" field should refer to the
Call for Contributions. Read the instructions in IEEE
802.16m-08/005 C802.16m-08/159r1 is identical to
S802.16m-08/159. There is no need for the "S" document in this case. In the
document C802.16m-08/159r1 the slide show template was wrongly used. There is no
"Re" field. The "Venue" field in the "S" document is OK.
The same applies to the pair
S802.16m-08/137 and C802.16m-08/137r1. S802.16m-08/170,171: The "base
document" should be C802.16m-08/170,171 The following documents don't seem to
refer to the subject they were allocated to in the "Re" field, or to any of the
topics in the CfC: 124, 137, 159, 170 Avi |