Dear all,
Please find in the "temp" directory an updated
contribution list for TGm (TGm 54 Contributions List_080317PM.xls. Thanks to
all of you who corrected the previous one. I hope you find it useful.
Enjoy the rides in Orlando
Avi
On 3/14/08 5:09 AM, "ext Avi Freedman" <avif@HEXAGONLTD.COM>
wrote:
Hi All,
An updated TGm contribution list for session 54 has been uploaded to the
"Temp" directory.
It seems to me that thanks to the upload server upgrade we have less documents
out of sequence and less confusion between "C" and "S"
documents etc. There are still a few documents with formatting problems,
which will be handled at the chair's discretion:
124r1 – Seems out of scope of the designated topic
125r1: No need to keep the instructions (in square brackets) within the
cover page.
145, 146, 201, 217: See below – no corrected version has been uploaded
yet.
187r1, 188r2, 220r1: The new version was not updated in the document
itself.
BR
Avi
From: Avi Freedman [mailto:avif@HEXAGONLTD.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:49
PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm]
Contributionss
Dear all
I uploaded to the "temp" directory an Excel file with all the
contributions uploaded so far, allocated according to their designated topic in
the "Re" field or my wild guess. Please have a look and see if I
missed any document or wrongly assigned them. Contributions with problems are
marked in red.
A few more problems with contributions:
121: No specific topic allocation in the "Re" field
126r1: Wrong document number in the header. The base document (126) does
not exist, but upload a corrected version as r2
174: No specific topic allocation in the "Re" field.
181, 125: Wrong document number (should be a C document, like the
filename). Remove the editing instructions from the cover page.
182: No "Re field, wrong abstract, no "purpose".
191: It seems it is just a commentary file. Any reason why was it uploaded
as a contribution? Please export it to a *.cmtb with the name
tgmsdd_YourName.cmtb
196: Wrong document number in the header
201: Wrong document number in the header
217: Wrong document number in the header
227: No indication in the "Re" field to which of the topics this
contribution refers to
Avi
From: Avi
Freedman [mailto:avif@hexagonltd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008
12:09 AM
To:
'STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: [TGm] Problematic
contributions
Dear all,
A new batch of contributions has arrived in the TGm upload directory, ensuring
us that we are going to have, as usual, a wonderful busy time. Some of the
contributions have some problems. Please make an effort to fix them and upload
a corrected version.
120: No specific topic in the "Re" Field. The "Re" field
should refer to a specific topic in the Call for Contributions. Read the
instructions in IEEE 802.16m-08/005
145, 146: No date, no RE field
147: The "Re" field should refer to the Call for Contributions. Read
the instructions in IEEE 802.16m-08/005
C802.16m-08/159r1 is identical to S802.16m-08/159. There is no need for the
"S" document in this case. In the document C802.16m-08/159r1 the
slide show template was wrongly used. There is no "Re" field. The
"Venue" field in the "S" document is OK.
The same applies to the pair S802.16m-08/137 and C802.16m-08/137r1.
S802.16m-08/170,171: The "base document" should be
C802.16m-08/170,171
The following documents don't seem to refer to the subject they were allocated
to in the "Re" field, or to any of the topics in the CfC:
124, 137, 159, 170
Avi