| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Jinyoung All I can do is refer you
to Phil's e-mail from Sept. 5. I cannot put it better. I just
deleted the text not relevant to your question: __________________________Excerpts
from Phil's Mail________________________________________________________________ The valid entries for the
Re: field on the contribution cover page are: SDD
Session 56 Cleanup [related to CfC&C item: Newly accepted text output from the
Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Sections 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11] PHY:
Text PHY:
Link PHY:
HARQ PHY:
MIMO MAC:
HO MAC:
Idle Mode MAC:
Sleep Mode MAC:
Data Plane MAC:
Network Entry MAC:
Connection Establishment & Maintenance PHY & MAC aspects of Location Services* PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS* Multi - Carrier Operation* Security* Multi-Radio Coexistence* For these last five italicized* topics the author
should clearly segment and identify the work as PHY or MAC The RG and Ad-hoc Chairs
will be filing consensus contributions on behalf of the following Rapporteur
Groups, by the deadline: PHY:
Text PHY:
Link PHY:
HARQ PHY:
MIMO MAC: HO MAC:
Idle Mode MAC:
Sleep Mode Sixth, obviously the
restrictions and process for RG and Ad-hoc material does not apply to those
items that were not part of any RG or Ad-hoc harmonization efforts: SDD
Session 56 Cleanup [related to CfC&C item: Newly accepted text output from the
Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Sections 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11] MAC:
Data Plane MAC:
Network Entry MAC:
Connection Establishment & Maintenance PHY & MAC aspects of Location Services* PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS* Multi - Carrier Operation* Security* Multi-Radio Coexistence* Comments and
contributions related to these topics will be reviewed, and for SDD Session 56
Cleanup items resolved during the Session. Expect the creation of Rapporteur
Groups to continue harmonization and consensus development on the unresolved
topics for the period after Session 57 till Session ____________________END_____________________________________________________________________________________- From: jychun
[mailto:jychun03@LGE.COM] Dear Avi and all, I wonder how items are
classified into ‘PHY SDD cleanup’ or “PHY text’. For example, as JK’s email, there are many
contributions related to UL control. But some contributions are in ‘PHY SDD cleanup’ and some are in ‘PHY text’. Please let me clarify it. Jinyoung From: Fwu,
Jong-kae [mailto:jong-kae.fwu@INTEL.COM] Dear Avi, After reviewing the contribution classifications from
others, I would like to change the classifications on our contribution form
“PHY text” to “PHY SDD cleanup” to be more aligned with
the rest of the group. Please change the classifications on the following 5
contributions for me (to “PHY SDD cleanup”). Thank you. -JK
From: Avi
Freedman [mailto:avif@HEXAGONLTD.COM] Dear All, I have uploaded the
contribution list of session 57 to the temp directory http://dot16.org/ul//upload/temp_db/TGmContributions57_Kobe_2008_09_08.xls Please note the
following:
Thanks for all the
efforts all the contributors make in preparing and submitting the contributions Avi
|