Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

[Wookbong Lee <wbong@LGE.COM>]

Title: [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

Dear Shkumbin,

 

Thanks for your effort, I think it was very hard work for you to put all the tag.

 

I would like to clarify some of comment related to MIMO section which you marked as out of scope but I think that is in scope since this is for newly accepted text output from the Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Section 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11.

 

Comment # 397, 403, 406, 411, 412, 413, 415, 416, 417, 418, 420, 421, 422, 423, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 433, 434, 435, 436, 440, 441, 444, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 460, 461, 463, 464

 : These comments can be classified into “SDD cleanup PHY” (deleting or modifying some text in the SDD.)

 

And the following comments are I think technical comment (currently marked as editorial.)

Comment # : 3, 115, 419, 446, 457, 459

 

BR,

Wookbong Lee

 

From: Shkumbin Hamiti [mailto:shkumbin.hamiti@NOKIA.COM]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:45 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

 

Dear colleagues,

I have just uploaded the Rev 1 of the SDD commentary DB, the IEEE 802.16m-08/034r1. You can find it here: http://dot16.org/ul//upload/TGm_db/802.16m%2d08_034r1.zip

This revision contains one file that I had missed in the first upload and few other files that were uploaded late.
In addition, and quite important, you will find a classification of comments. Please note that for those comments that had no classification by the author I have assumed a certain tag. I expect that there may be some misallocations, so I kindly ask you to check and if you disagree please let me know and I will correct it.

There are 160 editorial comments, and as usual there will be a motion to approve all of them in a batch. Since we would like to have this motion proposed quite early in the session I kindly ask to check the comment numbers below and let me know if you disagree on any of those.

Here is the rough text that will be proposed as a motion:

To accept the following list of comments in the IEEE 802.16m-08/034r1:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 30, 37, 38, 42, 44, 51, 91, 111, 112, 115, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, 141, 143, 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 167, 168, 173, 174, 176, 177, 178, 180, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 190, 191, 192, 193, 196, 197, 200, 201, 204, 205, 206, 208, 209, 210, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 222, 223, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 235, 239, 246, 252, 254, 256, 258, 259, 260, 265, 274, 289, 290, 304, 305, 308, 316, 319, 336, 339, 340, 342, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 372, 373, 374, 376, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 387, 388, 400, 405, 419, 432, 445, 446, 457, 459, 465, 469, 475, 525, 543, 576, 578, 579, 596,

and authorize the editor to implement those changes in the next issue of the SDD

Kind regards,
Shkumbin Hamiti
SDD Editor