| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Ron, Our comment 416 shows where the text is to be inserted. The
issue is with the subsection number level. We request you to include the comment
in the AWD as approved by TGm in the AWD. TGm members can make an editorial
comment if there is are any issues with text. Not including a technical
comment altogether seems not fair. The subsection numbering will continue to be
in flux until AWD becomes stable. I hope you can reconsider. Regards Kiran From: Ron Murias
[mailto:ron@MURIAS.CA] All, Thank you for your feedback on the AWD r2 document. I
am aware that we have some issues with the resolution of some of the comments.
As you may know, the correct way to resolve the issues is to submit
comments, using the Commentary database, for Session 62. Regards, Ron Murias On 3-Jun-09, at 2:39 AM, Jeongho Park wrote:
Dear Ron, Comment #469L is incorporated in AWD imperfectly. AWD 10r2 shows twisted subsection number regarding ‘interference
mitigation mechanism’. That section should have separate number with level of 15.2.x. You can check it out in page 129, line 3 in document 10r2. I appreciate your big effort. Best regards, Jeongho ------------------------------------------------- JEONGHO PARK Ph.D Senior Enginner TEL : 82-31-279-7528 E-mail : jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Telecommunication R&D Center Telecommunication Business SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ------------------------------------------------- From: jychun [mailto:jychun03@LGE.COM] Dear Ron, Thank you very much for your effort. I found some mistakes. Comment #374 is also not reflected in the
AWD(09/0010r2). The contribution number is C802.16m-09/874r1, and the section
number is 15.3.9.2.1.2 SFBCH. And Comment #351 is rejected but reflected in the AWD. The contribution number is 09/0912 and it is related to Analog
feedback. Please check and insert it in AWD. Best regards, Jinyoung From: Kiran
Kuchi [mailto:kkuchi@CEWIT.ORG.IN] Dear Ron, Comment 416 is not reflected in the current AWD document. I would like to clarify that the text belongs under
section 15.3.7.2.3.2 as
per the latest AWD. The section number mentioned in contribution 0893r4 is
based on the previous version of AWD which is obsolete. I appreciate if you can include the text proposed in comment 416
in the next revision. Regards Kiran Kuchi CEWiT From: Kiernan,
Brian G [mailto:Brian.Kiernan@INTERDIGITAL.COM] The updated 802.16m SDD and AWD have been posted on the 802.16
website (IEEE
802.16m-09/003r9a and IEEE
802.16m-09/0010r2 respectively).
Also posted are the corresponding comment databases. A Call for Comments and Contributions on the AWD has also been
posted, IEEE 802.16m-09/0028r1, http://www.ieee802.org/16/tgm/docs/80216m-09_0028r1.doc.
Comments are due 6 July, 2009 AOE. Please insure that any contributions which contain proposed text
or figures be submitted in an editable form. Brian |