Re: [STDS-802-16] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot: P802.16m to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) +++
Dear 802.16,
The IEEE 802 EC has granted conditional approval for us to forward P802.16m for Sponsor Ballot. Therefore, if WG Letter Ballot Recirc #31b closes successfully, we can move on to a 30-day Sponsor Ballot prior to Session #68.
Roger
> Colleagues,
>
> With the ballot deadline now passed, I have summarized the results below. Please notify me of any errors.
>
> Roger
>
> VC APP Pat Thaler
> VC APP Mat Sherman
> ES APP Jon Rosdahl
> RS APP James Gilb
> TR APP John Hawkins
> 1 APP Tony Jeffree
> 3 APP David Law
> 11 APP Bruce Kraemer
> 15 APP Bob Heile
> 16 APP Roger Marks
> 17 APP John Lemon
> 18 APP Mike Lynch
> 19 DNV Steve Shellhammer
> 20 APP Mark Klerer
> 21 APP Subir Das
> 22 APP Apurva Mody
>
> APP: 15
> DIS: 0
> ABS: 0
> DNV: 1
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Roger B. Marks <r.b.marks@ieee.org> wrote:
>> To: 802 EC
>> cc: 802.16 Reflector
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> Paul has authorized me to issue the following motion for your consideration.
>>
>> Motion: To grant conditional approval, per the IEEE 802 Operations Manual, to forward P802.16m for Sponsor Ballot.
>>
>> Moved: Roger Marks
>> Seconded: Subir Das
>>
>> Start of ballot: Friday 14 May 2010, 10:00 ET
>> Close of ballot: Monday 24 May 2010, 12:00 ET
>>
>> Early close: Not requested.
>>
>> Information:
>>
>> (1) I have provided all the supporting material in document IEEE 802.16-10/0037r1 <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/#10_0037>. The summary results from WG Letter Ballot are as follows:
>> Approve: 291 (98.3%)
>> Disapprove with comments: 5
>> Abstain: 5
>>
>> (2) I know that many of you are busy with interim sessions this week, and I'm sorry to bother you with this. However, I am fully confident that conditional approval is justified, and we have a window of opportunity to run Sponsor Ballot prior to the July Plenary.
>>
>> (3) Please recall that I notified the EC at our last meeting (19 March) of my intent to bring this 10-day ballot. We agreed that it would be OK to proceed with it.
>>
>> Thanks for your time and consideration!
>>
>> Roger
>>
>