Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHzOperation (India)



Hi Mike,

 

I support Brian’s point.

The language in the letter has to be neutral across 802.

 

Regards,

Mariana

 

From: Mike Lynch [mailto:freqmgr@SBCGLOBAL.NET]
Sent: 09 February, 2011 7:59 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHzOperation (India)

 

Brian and Reza,

 

Based on the discussion on yesterday’s conference call the letter is to lobby for more technology neutral spectrum and not touch on the licensed or unlicensed use. Administrations will implement these bands as they feel is best for their requirements.

 

While many 802 technologies are used in an unlicensed mode that is not always the case. For example in some administrations the use of 802.11 in the 2.4 GHz band requires users to have a license. So it doesn’t seem useful to label some 802 technologies as “unlicensed” only as that may imply that they should not be permitted where an administration require users to obtain a license.

 

Regards,

 

Mike

 

From: Arefi, Reza [mailto:reza.arefi@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:11
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHz Operation (India)

 

I support Brian’s comment below.

 

Regards,

Reza

 

From: Kiernan, Brian G [mailto:Brian.Kiernan@INTERDIGITAL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:58 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHz Operation (India)

 

If the intent of the letter is to lobby for  unlicensed operation in that frequency band (TV White Spaces), then it should NOT be limited to just 802.22, but should encompass any 802 unlicensed technology aimed at that spectrum to include 802.11af, 802.19, or even 802.16h.  From both a market and regulatory perspective, making a band technology specific is too limiting and is counter to the direction of where the industry (and most regulators) are heading.  The EC should change any references to “802.22” to something like “IEEE 802 unlicensed technologies”.

 

Brian

 

From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 3:37 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHz Operation (India)

 

Please let me know if you have any comments on this letter.

 

Roger

 

 

Begin forwarded message:

 

From: "Mody, Apurva (US SSA)" <apurva.mody@baesystems.com>

Date: 8 February 2011 10:26:34 PM PST

To: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>

Cc: "MJLynch@mjlallc.com" <MJLynch@mjlallc.com>, John Notor <gnu@notor.com>, Gerald Chouinard <gerald.chouinard@crc.ca>, Winston Caldwell <Winston.Caldwell@fox.com>

Subject: 802.22 Letter to the WPC for 470 - 698 MHz Operation (India)

 

 

Hi Roger,

 

The 802.22 Working Group would like to submit the following letter

to the Wireless Planning and Co-ordination (WPC) Advisor in India through Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay. This letter was discussed during the 802.18 telecon held on Tuesday, Feb. 8th.

 

We (802.22) would like to endorse the IIT Bombay proposal for license-exempt use in the 470 – 698 MHz spectrum in India. IITs are the premier Engineering institutes in India. IIT academics are very well respected all around the world and they have been known to work closely with the Indian Govt. in the advisory role. The IIT-Bombay proposal has been attached for your reference.

 

Please review the letter and let us know your comments if any by Monday, Feb. 14th COB.

 

Many thanks

 

Apurva

 

Apurva N. Mody, Ph. D.

 

Chair, IEEE 802.22 Standard Working Group

BAE Systems

Technology Solutions

130 Daniel Webster Highway, Mail Stop 2350

Merrimack, NH 03054

Work: (603)885 2621, Mobile: (603)-809-0459

 

 

 

 

Attachment:

 



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(190).
************************************************************************************


************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(42).
************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(42).
************************************************************************************