[STDS-802-16] [DC#1] RE: [STDS-802-16] [802.16p][PWR RG] Summary of 1st PWR RG CC

["js.choi" <js.choi@LGE.COM>]

Dear 16p PWR RG chair and members,

 

First thanks to Kiseon for your summary and arranging the harmonization process. I can initiate the harmonization activity regarding DC#1 issue.

 

I just uploaded a material (C802.16p-rg-11/0037.ppt) to the RG server which includes motivation to support device cooperation in M2M, please refer that with the submitted contribution 0019. Any opinion and suggestion from members will be welcome.

 

Thank you.

 

Best regards,

Jinsoo

 

From: Kiseon Ryu [mailto:kiseon.ryu@LGE.COM]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 8:51 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [802.16p][PWR RG] Summary of 1st PWR RG CC

 

Dear 16p members,

 

Thanks to all of you for joining the first PWR RG conference call and sharing much valuable opinions.

I’ve uploaded the meeting summary capturing Q&A discussion during the call (80216p-rg-11_0034.doc) to the upload server.

 

Here are some key issues and action items of today's call:

 

1. Idle Mode Operation

[IDLE#1] New Group Paging Concept (Including hierarchical paging): Need to clarify its gain?

[IDLE#2] Modified & Additional LU mechanism (Cell-/Timer-based): Is new definition necessary?

[IDLE#3] Longer Paging Cycle

 

Hyunjeong, Soojung, and Giwon presented their contribution. I would like to ask someone among you volunteering to lead the harmonization on each topic.

 

 

2. Network Reentry from Idle Mode

[NE#1] Definition of Waiting Time before UL ranging for network re-entry

           a. Waiting time after receiving paging: Need to clarify its gain?

           b. Different ranging opportunities for M2M group with priority: Increased congestions to low priority group?

[NE#2] Dedicated ranging code and/or ranging region for M2M (e.g., S-RNG): Impact to legacy MS and its overhead of dedicated region?

 

Jin, Chiwoo, Ping-Heng, Andreas, Yu-Chuan, Wei-Chieh presented their contribution. I would like to ask someone among you volunteering to lead the harmonization on each topic.

 

3. Device collaboration

[DC#1] on-/off-state frame control for DC support: Need to clarify the power saving gain from device collaboration?

 

Jinsoo presented the contribution. Jinsoo, could you initiate harmonization activities with other members?

 

If there is any other issue, please let us know.

 

* Notes:

1. For all members who are interested in the above 6 issues, please share your opinion.

2. The initiation of the e-mail discussion, please use the HEADER (e.g., [IDLE#1], [NE#2]...) in the e-mail title.

 

Regards,

Kiseon Ryu

PWR RG Chair