Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Jaesun and all I believe it's more flexible to include ranging information in SCD. However, it also increases overhead. In addition, is “more flexible”
necessary? I think that a simple pre-defined table indicating ranging information
shall be sufficient. Therefore, only the priority factor needs to be assigned before the
devices entering idle mode. Best regards, From:
차재선
[mailto:jscha@etri.re.kr] Dear Lei and all Thank you for your response. Yes, there are two trigger modes for network reentry. So, I would like
to hear other member's opinion on the use of single mechanism for both cases. If authors of contributions (C0008, C0009, C0017, C0026) give us
feedbacks on the high-level operation, then we can try to provide the
consolidated contribution. Regarding ranging information, Yes, you are right. Ranging information
is carried by S-SFH SP3. But, there are only 3 types of ranging information
(initial, HO, BR). We can further divide ranging information only for M BR, Jaesun Cha Senior Engineer Wireless Access
Technology Research Team Mobile Telecommunication Research
Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research
Institute TEL: +82-42-860-5587, FAX: +82-42-861-1966 ----------------------------------------------------- From:
lei zhou [mailto:l.zhou@samsung.com] Dear Jaesun and all: Thank you for Jaesun's initializing discussion
on network reentry. I am Lei from Samsung. I have the similar view on network reentry trigger
with Jaesun. There are two trigger modes for network reentry inculding network
and terminals (MS and Group).For network reentry triggered M Btw, BR Lei ------- Original Message ------- Sender : 차재선<jscha@etri.re.kr> Date : 二月 14, 2011 19:15 (GMT+09:00) Title : [STDS-802-16] [16p PWR RG - NE #1] Discussion on
access control during network reentry from idle mode Dear all
I'm Jaesun Cha from ETRI. I have uploaded a new contribution regarding access control in the
upload server (C802.16p-rg-11/0035). So, I sent this e-mail to inform you of
the new contribution and to discuss access control related contributions
including my contribution. According to Contribution #33r2, there are 5 contributions regarding
access control (including my contribution). Most of them propose an assignment
of additional access control information but assignment
method and detailed information are different from one another. So, I would like to suggest to discuss a high-level piture on
access control method before going into detailed access control
information. For example, How does an ABS indicate any additional
information for ranging process? When does an ABS assign an additional
parameter for ranging process? Once an aggrement on this high-level operation is made, we can go
further to discuss any detailed access control information. Here is my opinion on access control. I agree that access congestion may happen after group paging. But,
although there is no paging, access control may happen. If an AMS has UL
data to be transmitted during idle mode, it will perform network reentry by
transmitting a ranging code. In smart metering use case, many devices may have
same report period, which means that many smart metering devices
will perform ranging process at the same time. So, I think we have to provide the same access control
mechanism for network reentry triggered by a network as well as by an AMS.
For doing that, I proposes to transmit system information regarding
access control for M Anyone who is interested in access control please share your opinion
through this e-mail thread. Any comments on my suggestion or my contribution are welcomed. Thank you. Best Regards, Jaesun Cha Senior Engineer Wireless Access
Technology Research Team Mobile Telecommunication Research
Laboratory Electronics and Telecommunications Research
Institute TEL: +82-42-860-5587, FAX: +82-42-861-1966 -----------------------------------------------------
Dear 16p members, Thanks to all of
you for joining the first PWR RG conference call and sharing much valuable
opinions. I’ve uploaded the meeting summary capturing
Q&A discussion during the call (80216p-rg-11_0034.doc) to the upload
server. Here are some key
issues and action items of today's call: 1. Idle Mode
Operation [IDLE#1] New Group
Paging Concept (Including hierarchical paging): Need to clarify its gain? [IDLE#2] Modified
& Additional LU mechanism (Cell-/Timer-based): Is new definition necessary? [IDLE#3] Longer
Paging Cycle Hyunjeong, Soojung,
and Giwon presented their contribution. I would like to ask someone among you
volunteering to lead the harmonization on each topic. 2. Network Reentry
from Idle Mode [NE#1] Definition
of Waiting Time before UL ranging for network re-entry
a. Waiting time after receiving paging: Need to clarify its gain?
b. Different ranging opportunities for M [NE#2] Dedicated
ranging code and/or ranging region for M Jin, Chiwoo,
Ping-Heng, Andreas, Yu-Chuan, Wei-Chieh presented their contribution. I would
like to ask someone among you volunteering to lead the harmonization on each
topic. 3. Device
collaboration [DC#1]
on-/off-state frame control for DC support: Need to clarify the power saving
gain from device collaboration? Jinsoo presented
the contribution. Jinsoo, could you initiate harmonization activities with
other members? If there is any
other issue, please let us know. * Notes: 1. For all members
who are interested in the above 6 issues, please share your opinion. 2. The initiation
of the e-mail discussion, please use the HEADER (e.g., [IDLE#1], [NE#2]...) in
the e-mail title. Regards, Kiseon Ryu PWR RG Chair 本信件可能包含工?院機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿使用或揭露本信件內容,?請銷?此信件。 This email may contain confidential information. Please do not use or disclose it in any way and delete it if you are not the intended recipient. |