Dear Eldad,
Thank you for your suggestion. I’ve looked at several time zones and it seems that PST 8AM looks fine for most.
If this is okay for everybody, I’ll send the webex link and bridge information tomorrow.
Best Regards.
Inuk Jung.
From: Zeira, Eldad [mailto:Eldad.Zeira@INTERDIGITAL.COM]
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:51 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [PPC-HN] Meeting minutes of PPC-HN CC#1 with agenda for CC#2
Thanks, Inuk
8PM in San Francisco is:
11PM in US east coast
4, 5 and 6AM in England, Central Europe and Israel respectively
10am in Korea
May I propose 7am in San Francisco which is 9pm in Korea?
Thanks for your consideration,
Eldad
Office +1 631 622 4134
Mobile +1 631 428 4052
Based in NY area
From: Inuk Jung [mailto:inuk.jung@LGE.COM]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 4:06 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [PPC-HN] Meeting minutes of PPC-HN CC#1 with agenda for CC#2
Dear PPC-HN members,
The meeting minutes for today’s PPC-HN minutes are as follows:
• Comments on contribution
– Offline discussion for further understanding was suggested for Multi-RAT scenario clean up contribution
– Distributed antenna text from Ying’s contribution, Single-RAT clean up contribution, was requested for deletion
– Study Report should not address any specific Interworking protocol, but leave a placeholder for them (i.e. defining a L2.5 for possible interworking protocol). Details can be written in later stages
• Q) Are we going to design L2.5? Response) No, it’s just a placeholder for now. An existing layer or a very simple one may be used. Details to be described in later stages.
– Change ‘shall’ to ‘may’ for using NDNS, and change of name was suggested for NDNS to a more general one (e.g. Network information server)
– BS-AP coordination has both wired/wireless connection to the cellular core network, but this is out of scope for consideration at this stage
• Most members have submitted contributions that are more open rather than specific, which is more suitable for proposing further possible technical issues
• Editor’s suggestion:
– Editor (Inuk Jung) will try to merge the text of all the proposed contribution, which we may review for agreement in the next CC. This is for easier review and harmonization on the submitted text.
Also the time for CC#2, 8PM PST 24th Feb is suggested (by mye) which will be: (if this is not acceptable please let me know personally)
• Israel – 6AM (a little early)
• Europe – 12AM (late)
• San Francisco – 8PM
(*bridge information for CC#2 will be announced as soon after the time schedule is set : )
Agenda of CC#2 would be as follows:
• Review of submitted contributions during today’s CC for agreement (unbracketing text) – editor will try to merge all proposed text submitted for CC#1 (will upload to ‘tmp’ directory by 21st Feb.)
• Presentation of submitted contributions for CC#2
• Discussion on PAR planning
Best Regards.
Inuk Jung
PPC-HN Adhoc lead