| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Inuk and LG folks: I uploaded editorial corrections to your
“Proposed
texts for clarification on Multi-RAT deployment scenarios of Hierarchical
Networks Study Report” contribution. It can be found here: http://dot16.org/ul//upload/temp_db/PPC-HN802_16_MultiRATscenarioscleanup_ALU.doc BR, Peretz Feder From: Feder, Peretz (Peretz) Inuk and Samsung folks: I uploaded editorial corrections to your
“Proposed Revision on
Single Radio Access Technology (RAT) Related Sections in Hierarchical Networks
Study Report” contribution.
It can be found here: http://dot16.org/ul//upload/temp_db/PPC-HN802_16_SingleRATrevision_ALU.doc BR, Peretz Feder From: Inuk Jung [mailto:inuk.jung@LGE.COM] Dear PPC-HN members, The meeting minutes for today’s PPC-HN minutes are as follows: •
Comments on contribution –
Offline discussion for further
understanding was suggested for Multi-RAT scenario clean up contribution –
Distributed antenna text from Ying’s
contribution, Single-RAT clean up contribution, was requested for deletion –
Study Report should not address
any specific Interworking protocol, but leave a placeholder for them (i.e.
defining a L2.5 for possible interworking protocol). Details can be written in
later stages •
Q) Are we going to design L2.5?
Response) No, it’s just a placeholder for now. An existing layer or a
very simple one may be used. Details to be described in later stages. –
Change ‘shall’ to ‘may’
for using NDNS, and change of name was suggested for NDNS to a more general one
(e.g. Network information server) –
BS-AP coordination has both
wired/wireless connection to the cellular core network, but this is out of
scope for consideration at this stage •
Most members have submitted
contributions that are more open rather than specific, which is more suitable
for proposing further possible technical issues •
Editor’s suggestion: –
Editor (Inuk Jung) will try to
merge the text of all the proposed contribution, which we may review for
agreement in the next CC. This is for easier review and harmonization on the
submitted text. Also the time for CC#2, 8PM PST 24th
Feb is suggested (by mye) which will be: (if this is not
acceptable please let me know personally) •
•
•
(*bridge information for CC#2 will be
announced as soon after the time schedule is set : ) Agenda of CC#2 would be as follows: •
Review of submitted contributions
during today’s CC for agreement (unbracketing text) – editor will try to merge all proposed text
submitted for CC#1 (will upload to ‘tmp’ directory by 21st
Feb.) •
Presentation of submitted
contributions for CC#2 •
Discussion on PAR planning Best Regards. Inuk Jung PPC-HN Adhoc lead |