|
Leon,
You're right.
Since CoS is not 'required as part of Phase I,
results do not have to be broken down by CoS either (for Phase I). However, it
will apply in Phase II.
Thanks for catching this.
:-)
__________________________________________
*** Please notice new
e-mail address ***
Khaled Amer President, AmerNet Inc. Architecture Analysis and
Performance Modeling Specialists Address: 13711
Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA
92620 Phone:
(949)552-1114
Fax:
(949)552-1116
e-mail: amer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.performancemodeling.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:14 AM
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] RPR Perf: Proposed
Charter and list of accomplishments
Khaled,
During phase 1, throughput and fairness will be
measured per class, but CoS is delayed to phase 2. I find this a little bit
contradictory.
Could you please explain ?
Leon
All,
As most of you know, the performance adhoc committee of 802.17 was formed
in January 2001 to respond to the performance modeling needs of 802.17. Its
activities started before then when it was a pre-adhoc committee formed
in July 2000 to address these needs. I volunteered to help by chairing
this effort in the meantime since performance modeling is what I do for a
living.
Since 802.17 is now an official WG with rules and procedures to follow,
the plan is to have a motion to 802.17 to officially charter the
performance modeling ad-hoc committee in the coming interim meeting in May
(assuming that we meet our quorum requirements, otherwise we will have
to take all the motions as straw polls, and ask to have those straw polls
affirmed at our July meeting).
Based on the discussions that we had in the past several sessions of the
ad-hoc committee, I pulled together the points that were agreed upon
within the ad-hoc, and I'm posting them here for any opinions and
feedback. I'm including the following:
- Proposed Charter
- Summary list of accomplishments to date
- Preliminary list of some of the open issues that the performance
modeling ad-hoc group can help resolve
Please have a look at these items (which are attached) and voice
any opinions that you may have on the reflector. These are preliminary. Your
feedback and input are most welcome. My proposed plan is as follows:
- Debate these items on the reflector
- Confirm the charter at the performance adhoc committee meetings in May
- Invite people who wish to run for chair of the performance ad-hoc
committee to declare their intent on the reflector (with a short bio) and
at the meeting in May
- Hold an election within the ad-hoc for a chair
- Have a motion put forward on Thursday to officially charter the
adhoc, and another motion to confirm the Adhoc's choice of chair
Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
__________________________________________
*** Please notice new
e-mail address ***
Khaled Amer
President, AmerNet
Inc.
Architecture Analysis and Performance Modeling
Specialists
Address: 13711 Solitaire Way, Irvine,
CA 92620
Phone:
(949)552-1114
Fax:
(949)552-1116
e-mail: amer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.performancemodeling.com
|