Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question

To: Wolfram Lemppenau <wle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, vasan.karighattam@xxxxxxxxx, afaber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
From: George Suwala <gsuwala@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 22:03:28 -0700
Cc: stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <3AE4998C.11B9989F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx

Wolfi,

At 11:07 PM 4/23/2001 +0200, Wolfram Lemppenau wrote:

>Hi Angela, hi Vasan,
>
>one more comment on using APS functionality of SDH:
>
>according ITU-T Rec. G.841 max. 16 nodes per ring are supported.
>In 802.17-rings we will have more nodes (max.).
>
>(I guess thats also one of the reasons why Cisco does not use K1/K2)

Indeed that was one of the reasons for not using K1/K2 and also for not
using the exact format of K1/K2 in the SRP/DPT protection protocol (IPS).
But the main reason was to keep the SRP transport independent.

thanks

George

>Wolfi

References:
- Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
  - From: Wolfram Lemppenau

Prev by Date: Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
Next by Date: RE: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
Prev by thread: Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] Phy Layer question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread