Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption




A correction, Devendra.  Ethernet does not re-transmit
on FCS error.  IP does, after considerable ack/nack delay.
RPR, I presume, does not keep a packet around to re-transmit
on FCS error either.

Yong.

============================================
Yongbum "Yong" Kim      Direct (408)922-7502
Technical Director      Mobile (408)887-1058
3151 Zanker Road        Fax    (408)922-7530
San Jose, CA 95134      Main   (408)501-7800
ybkim@xxxxxxxxxxxx      www.broadcom.com
============================================


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Devendra Tripathi
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:17 AM
To: jeanlou.dupont@xxxxxxxxxxx; Raman Venkataraman
Cc: William Dai; stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption



> * Arbitrary artefacts: this type of artefact can be supported by the same
> framing methods (HDLC, 8B/10B). The HDLC layer has an "ABORT"
> code standardized
> for example.

Actually, this is what I thought when pre-emption was suggested first. By
creating a CRC error (Ethernet case), we essentially re-transmit the packet.

Regards,
Tripathi.