Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption

To: <jeanlou.dupont@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Raman Venkataraman" <kvraman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
From: "Devendra Tripathi" <tripathi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:16:54 -0700
Cc: "William Dai" <wdai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <85256A42.005470B8.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx


> * Arbitrary artefacts: this type of artefact can be supported by the same
> framing methods (HDLC, 8B/10B). The HDLC layer has an "ABORT"
> code standardized
> for example.

Actually, this is what I thought when pre-emption was suggested first. By
creating a CRC error (Ethernet case), we essentially re-transmit the packet.

Regards,
Tripathi.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
  - From: Yongbum Kim

References:
- Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
  - From: jeanlou.dupont

Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
Next by Date: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
Prev by thread: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
Next by thread: RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread