|
To all voting on the Terms and Definitions
Document.
Please carefully follow the instructions in filling
out the ballots to keep the workload for our over-worked volunteers to a
reasonable level. Specifically.
1) Each person should cast a single ballot.
The Subject for the note containing the ballot should be one of the following
four:
a) Approve
without comment
b) Approve
with comment
c) Disapprove
d)
Abstain
2) within the text, the corresponding line should
be the only one checked.
3) Each comment should have an indicated comment
type which must be T (for Technical), TR (for Technical, Required), and E
(for Editorial). Any disapprove will be based on having outstanding TR
comments. If your TR comments are all accommodated to your liking, the
assumption is that your vote will change from DisApprove to
Approve.
3) The comments should be sent to John Hawkins and
Bob Sultan, but not to the 802.17 reflector.
4) Carefully follow the requested format for each
ballot comment. John Hawkins must rely on your following the format
exactly so that he can have a program automatically extract the correct data for
each of the fields he needs in creating the data base.
If you have already sent in your ballot comments
without following the above instructions, please send a note to John Hawkins
asking if you should resubmit your ballot following the instructions exactly so
his software can deal with it.
For those that have still not voted ... There is
not much time, but you can still get your ballot in. If you have no
intention of reading the Terms and Definitions, please send in your ballot with
an Abstain for lack of expertise on this section.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love Chair, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance President, LAN
Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC
27615 Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919
810-7816 email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx
Fax: 208 978-1187
Working Group Ballot August, 2001
(Terms and Definitions for Resilient Packet
Ring)
Your Name:______Necdet
Uzun_____________________
_x__ APPROVE WITHOUT COMMENT ( rest of the
subclauses which are not mentioned below)
___ APPROVE WITH
COMMENTS
_x__
DO NOT APPROVE (see below)
___ ABSTAIN, List Reason i.e. Lack of
Expertise, Lack of Time:
____________________________
------ END OF BALLOT SECTION -------
IF YOU ARE VOTING "APPROVE WITHOUT COMMENT" or
ABSTAINING, YOUR WORK
IS DONE
AT THIS POINT. COMMENT
INFORMATION: COMMENTS ARE
APPROPRIATE IN THE INSTANCE OF AN "APPROVE WITH COMMENT"
VOTE AND REQUIRED IN THE INSTANCE OF A "DO NOT APPROVE"
VOTE.
"DO NOT APPROVE" VOTES
MUST BE BACKED UP BY COMMENTS CLASSIFIED AS
"TECHNICAL REQUIRED" AND THESE MUST PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
REMEDY AS
TO CHANGE THE VOTE TO
AN "APPROVE" IF ADOPTED. ALL COMMENTS SHOULD
INCLUDE CHANGES REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE THE STATED
CONCERN. PLEASE USE THE FORM BELOW
FOR ALL COMMENTS. MULTIPLE COMMENTS CAN BE
SUBMITTED IN ONE ASCII TEXT FILE OR E-MAIL. SIMPLY ADD
YOUR PERSONAL DATA
AND THEN
COPY THE LINES FOLLOWING "------
COMMENT SECTION -------"
AND
REPEAT AS OFTEN AS REQUIRED WITHIN THE FILE OR EMAIL. PLEASE USE
THE
FORMAT BELOW, MAKING SURE
THAT THE COMMENTS ARE IN ASCII FORM AND THAT
EACH COMMENT INCLUDES:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Acceptable comment types:
E = Editorial
T = Technical
TR = Technical Required
------ COMMENT SECTION -------
Comments on P802.17/TD1.0 CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 4
Page:
1
Line: 14
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: backpressure can be
sent by any means, it does not have to be sent by using a frame.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change "control frame"
to "control signal"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 20
Page:
2
Line: 43
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: committed burst size
needs to be measured in a shorter time duration than CIR.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Change "Tc" to "Tb",
where Tb is the interval of measuring the burst size. Note that Tb << Tc.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 31
Page:
3
Line: 71
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: Stripped means that
frame is removed from the ring, hence you can not copy and strip.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change "stripped" to
"received".
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 39
Page:
3
Line: 89
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: Definition is
confusing.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Rewrite. As simple as " Reception of a
frame more than once by the destination." would be good enough.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 41
Page:
4
Line: 95
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: out-of-sequence
frames are only relevant if they are from the same priority.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Modify the start of the sentence as "A
same priority frame (Ft) ..."
RemedyEnd:
Comment #:
2
Comment: "after frame Ft+1,
..." is not sufficient enough for ordered delivery.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Modify the whole thing as "A same priority frame (Ft)
arriving at a destination station after Ft+1 or before Ft-1 in a sequence of
frames F0, F1, F2, ...., Fn sent from a source station.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 56
Page:
5
Line: 123
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: "receiving station"
may not be congested but an intermediate station may be.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Replace "receiving station" in line 125 with "congested
station"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 64
Page:
5
Line: 139
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: There is no need to
define the term "global spatial reuse". The term "spatial reuse" is
enough.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: delete this subclause.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: all others
Page:
Line:
CommentType (E,
T, TR): APPROVE
Comment
#:
Comment:
CommentEnd:
RemedyEnd:
|