TA Document
IEEE802.17-11Jul2001/:7, July 11, 2000
Working Group Ballot August, 2001
(Terms and Definitions for Resilient Packet
Ring)
Your Name:______Necdet
Uzun_____________________
_x__ APPROVE WITHOUT COMMENT ( rest of the
subclauses which are not mentioned below)
___ APPROVE WITH
COMMENTS
_x__ DO NOT APPROVE (see below)
___ ABSTAIN,
List Reason i.e. Lack of Expertise, Lack of Time:
____________________________
------ END OF BALLOT SECTION -------
IF YOU ARE VOTING "APPROVE WITHOUT COMMENT"
or ABSTAINING, YOUR WORK
IS
DONE AT THIS POINT. COMMENT
INFORMATION: COMMENTS ARE
APPROPRIATE IN THE INSTANCE OF AN "APPROVE WITH COMMENT"
VOTE AND REQUIRED IN THE INSTANCE OF A "DO
NOT APPROVE" VOTE.
"DO NOT
APPROVE" VOTES MUST BE BACKED UP BY COMMENTS CLASSIFIED AS
"TECHNICAL REQUIRED" AND THESE MUST PROVIDE
SUFFICIENT REMEDY AS
TO
CHANGE THE VOTE TO AN "APPROVE" IF ADOPTED. ALL COMMENTS
SHOULD
INCLUDE CHANGES
REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE THE STATED CONCERN. PLEASE USE THE FORM BELOW FOR ALL COMMENTS. MULTIPLE COMMENTS CAN
BE
SUBMITTED IN ONE ASCII
TEXT FILE OR E-MAIL. SIMPLY ADD YOUR PERSONAL DATA
AND THEN COPY THE LINES
FOLLOWING "------ COMMENT SECTION
-------"
AND REPEAT AS OFTEN
AS REQUIRED WITHIN THE FILE OR EMAIL. PLEASE USE THE
FORMAT BELOW, MAKING SURE THAT THE COMMENTS ARE IN
ASCII FORM AND THAT
EACH
COMMENT INCLUDES:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Acceptable comment types:
E = Editorial
T = Technical
TR = Technical Required
------ COMMENT SECTION -------
Comments on P802.17/TD1.0
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 4
Page:
1
Line: 14
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: backpressure can
be sent by any means, it does not have to be sent by using a
frame.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change "control frame" to "control
signal"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 20
Page:
2
Line: 43
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: committed burst
size needs to be measured in a shorter time duration than CIR.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Change "Tc" to "Tb",
where Tb is the interval of measuring the burst size. Note that Tb <<
Tc.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 31
Page:
3
Line: 71
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: Stripped means
that frame is removed from the ring, hence you can not copy and
strip.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change "stripped" to "received".
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 39
Page:
3
Line: 89
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: Definition is
confusing.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Rewrite. As simple as " Reception of a
frame more than once by the destination." would be good enough.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 41
Page:
4
Line: 95
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: out-of-sequence
frames are only relevant if they are from the same priority.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Modify the start of the sentence as
"A same priority frame (Ft) ..."
RemedyEnd:
Comment #:
2
Comment: "after frame Ft+1,
..." is not sufficient enough for ordered delivery.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Modify the whole thing as "A same priority frame (Ft)
arriving at a destination station after Ft+1 or before Ft-1 in a sequence of
frames F0, F1, F2, ...., Fn sent from a source station.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 56
Page:
5
Line: 123
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: "receiving
station" may not be congested but an intermediate station may
be.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Replace "receiving
station" in line 125 with "congested station"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 64
Page:
5
Line: 139
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR, DO NOT
APPROVE
Comment #:
1
Comment: There is no need
to define the term "global spatial reuse". The term "spatial reuse" is
enough.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: delete this subclause.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail:
nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: all others
Page:
Line:
CommentType (E,
T, TR): APPROVE
Comment
#:
Comment:
CommentEnd:
RemedyEnd: