TA Document IEEE802.17-11Jul2001/:7, July
11, 2000
Working Group Ballot August, 2001
(Terms and Definitions for Resilient
Packet Ring)
Your Name:______Necdet Uzun_____________________
_x__ APPROVE WITHOUT
COMMENT ( rest of the subclauses which are not mentioned below)
___ APPROVE WITH
COMMENTS
_x__ DO NOT APPROVE
(see below)
___ ABSTAIN,
List Reason i.e. Lack of Expertise, Lack of Time:
____________________________
------ END OF BALLOT SECTION -------
IF YOU ARE VOTING "APPROVE WITHOUT
COMMENT" or ABSTAINING, YOUR WORK
IS DONE AT THIS POINT.
COMMENT INFORMATION: COMMENTS
ARE APPROPRIATE IN THE INSTANCE OF AN "APPROVE WITH COMMENT"
VOTE AND REQUIRED IN THE INSTANCE
OF A "DO NOT APPROVE" VOTE.
"DO NOT APPROVE" VOTES MUST BE BACKED
UP BY COMMENTS CLASSIFIED AS
"TECHNICAL REQUIRED" AND THESE MUST
PROVIDE SUFFICIENT REMEDY AS
TO CHANGE THE VOTE TO AN "APPROVE"
IF ADOPTED. ALL COMMENTS SHOULD
INCLUDE CHANGES REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE
THE STATED CONCERN. PLEASE
USE THE FORM BELOW FOR ALL COMMENTS. MULTIPLE COMMENTS CAN BE
SUBMITTED IN ONE ASCII TEXT FILE OR
E-MAIL. SIMPLY ADD YOUR PERSONAL DATA
AND THEN COPY THE LINES FOLLOWING
"------ COMMENT SECTION -------"
AND REPEAT AS OFTEN AS REQUIRED WITHIN
THE FILE OR EMAIL. PLEASE USE THE
FORMAT BELOW, MAKING SURE THAT THE
COMMENTS ARE IN ASCII FORM AND THAT
EACH COMMENT INCLUDES:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Acceptable comment types:
E = Editorial
T = Technical
TR = Technical Required
------ COMMENT SECTION -------
Comments on P802.17/TD1.0
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 4
Page: 1
Line: 14
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: backpressure can be sent
by any means, it does not have to be sent by using a frame.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change
"control frame" to "control signal"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 20
Page: 2
Line: 43
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: committed burst size needs
to be measured in a shorter time duration than CIR.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Change
"Tc" to "Tb", where Tb is the interval of measuring the burst size. Note
that Tb << Tc.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 31
Page: 3
Line: 71
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: Stripped means that frame
is removed from the ring, hence you can not copy and strip.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Change
"stripped" to "received".
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 39
Page: 3
Line: 89
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: Definition is confusing.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Rewrite.
As simple as " Reception of a frame more than once by the destination."
would be good enough.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 41
Page: 4
Line: 95
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: out-of-sequence frames are
only relevant if they are from the same priority.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy:Modify the start of
the sentence as "A same priority frame (Ft) ..."
RemedyEnd:
Comment #: 2
Comment: "after frame Ft+1, ..." is
not sufficient enough for ordered delivery.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Modify the whole
thing as "A same priority frame (Ft) arriving at a destination station
after Ft+1 or before Ft-1 in a sequence of frames F0, F1, F2, ...., Fn
sent from a source station.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 56
Page: 5
Line: 123
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: "receiving station" may not
be congested but an intermediate station may be.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: Replace "receiving
station" in line 125 with "congested station"
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: 64
Page: 5
Line: 139
CommentType (E, T, TR): TR,
DO NOT APPROVE
Comment #: 1
Comment: There is no need to define
the term "global spatial reuse". The term "spatial reuse" is enough.
CommentEnd:
SuggestedRemedy: delete this subclause.
RemedyEnd:
CommenterName: Necdet Uzun
CommenterEmail: nuzun@xxxxxxxxx
CommenterPhone: 408-853-0461
CommenterCellPhone:
CommenterCompany: Cisco Systems
Clause: 1
Subclause: all others
Page:
Line:
CommentType (E, T, TR): APPROVE
Comment #:
Comment:
CommentEnd:
RemedyEnd:
|