Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
All, as we get ready for our upcoming January
interim meeting we need to redouble our efforts to bring the three RPR proposals
into agreement. There should be multiple avenues of communication between
the Alladin and Gandalf camps, and additional efforts to integrate the DVJ
proposal. I am concerned that moving toward agreement is being hampered
because too few people are involved.
We need to work through differences and
ideally develop a single proposal going into the January meeting. My best
technical judgment is that the group will have a much better first draft if
there is a single proposal going into the January meeting, than if we arrive at
a decision by voting. The reason is obvious. Voting at a meeting
does not allow the quiet reflection time that a carefully crafted proposal can
have that has been studied closely over a more significant time period
beforehand. In addition, if we go into the January meeting with a single
proposal, we will have the entire meeting to focus on and potentially improve
that proposal, rather than arguing the merits of competing proposals or creating
a new compromise proposal.
For the benefit of all RPR stakeholders I implore
everyone involved in this standards development to study the existing proposals
and seek out ways of bringing them together.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love
Chair, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance President, LAN Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816 email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx Fax: 208 978-1187 |