Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [RPRWG] RE: Evaluation of timeToLive alternatives


Dave,

Is this the position of the BAH? I see a number of controversial text in that.
I do not think I would vote for it when it comes in front of the WG.

Thanks.

Necdet

David James wrote:

> Necdet,
>
> As background for this dicussion, you may wish to read
> the flooding attachent. This represents relatively
> complete problem statements and solutions, as viewed
> by the BAH flooding subadhoc.
>
> If you then have a concrete counterproposal that
> you feel handles the scenarios discussed in this
> writeup, but in a better way, I'm sure we would
> all be interested in reading them.
>
> DVJ
>
> David V. James, PhD
> Chief Architect
> Network Processing Solutions
> Data Communications Division
> Cypress Semiconductor, Bldg #3
> 3901 North First Street
> San Jose, CA 95134-1599
> Work: +1.408.545.7560
> Cell: +1.650.954.6906
> Fax:  +1.408.456.1962
> Work: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Name: Flooding.pdf
>    Flooding.pdf    Type: Portable Document Format (application/pdf)
>                Encoding: base64