Re: [RPRWG] RE: Evaluation of timeToLive alternatives
Dave,
I am reviewing it and embedding my comments. Once I finish I will send it to you.
Thanks.
Necdet
David James wrote:
> Necdet,
>
> Answering questions:
> > Is this the position of the BAH?
> It relects the consensus of the floowing subtask group.
> The main group has seen a presentation, but would
> clearly need more review time to agree/reject/revise.
>
> > I see a number of controversial text in that.
> I'm quite sure there are. Its amazing what can
> be discovered simply by writing down abstract
> concepts and performing consistency checks.
>
> > I do not think I would vote for it when it comes
> > in front of the WG.
> Could you please illustrate why, and recommend
> specific changes that could change your vote?
>
> I'm sure all would desire an equally effective
> but simpler protocol, provided one can be shown
> to exist. But, its hard to understand your
> concerns when phrased as disapprove/no-comment.
>
> DVJ
>
> David V. James, PhD
> Chief Architect
> Network Processing Solutions
> Data Communications Division
> Cypress Semiconductor, Bldg #3
> 3901 North First Street
> San Jose, CA 95134-1599
> Work: +1.408.545.7560
> Cell: +1.650.954.6906
> Fax: +1.408.456.1962
> Work: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Necdet Uzun
> > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 10:42 AM
> > To: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: 'Jim Kao'; 'Mike Takefman'; David V. James; stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx;
> > Anoop Ghanwani
> > Subject: Re: [RPRWG] RE: Evaluation of timeToLive alternatives
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > Is this the position of the BAH? I see a number of controversial text in that.
> > I do not think I would vote for it when it comes in front of the WG.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Necdet
> >
> > David James wrote:
> >
> > > Necdet,
> > >
> > > As background for this dicussion, you may wish to read
> > > the flooding attachent. This represents relatively
> > > complete problem statements and solutions, as viewed
> > > by the BAH flooding subadhoc.
> > >
> > > If you then have a concrete counterproposal that
> > > you feel handles the scenarios discussed in this
> > > writeup, but in a better way, I'm sure we would
> > > all be interested in reading them.
> > >
> > > DVJ
> > >
> > > David V. James, PhD
> > > Chief Architect
> > > Network Processing Solutions
> > > Data Communications Division
> > > Cypress Semiconductor, Bldg #3
> > > 3901 North First Street
> > > San Jose, CA 95134-1599
> > > Work: +1.408.545.7560
> > > Cell: +1.650.954.6906
> > > Fax: +1.408.456.1962
> > > Work: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Name: Flooding.pdf
> > > Flooding.pdf Type: Portable Document Format (application/pdf)
> > > Encoding: base64
> >
> >