Re: [RPRWG] Liason from SG 7/17
Right now it is me. If someone else is going to
geneva, they can volunteer and we can make a
WG decision on accepting them.
mike
George Suwala wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> do you think we need a designated liaison between .17 and SG7/17?
>
> thanks
>
> George
>
> At 12:47 PM 11/7/2002 -0500, Mike Takefman wrote:
>
> >RPRWGers,
> >
> >the ITU SG7/17 rapporteur has sent us a new contribution
> >on X.msr which he believes removes all overlap with .17.
> >
> >Given that one of our jobs in Hawaii is to review their
> >draft we should do the latest one. Please give it a read
> >and I would be interested in all feedback both on the
> >question of overlap and technical correctness.
> >
> >I have my opinions on whether the overlap is gone and
> >the level of correctness.
> >
> >The doc is in our member's area under ITU and it is the november
> >6th contribution.
> >
> >Dr. Yu has also at my suggestion sent liasons to dot 1
> >and dot 3 given the work being done in those areas.
> >
> >cheers,
> >
> >mike
> >--
> >Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
> >Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
> >Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
> >2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
> >voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
--
Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991