Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [RPRWG] Liason from SG 7/17




Mike,

do you think we need a designated liaison between .17 and SG7/17?

thanks

George

At 12:47 PM 11/7/2002 -0500, Mike Takefman wrote:

>RPRWGers, 
>
>the ITU SG7/17 rapporteur has sent us a new contribution
>on X.msr which he believes removes all overlap with .17.
>
>Given that one of our jobs in Hawaii is to review their
>draft we should do the latest one. Please give it a read
>and I would be interested in all feedback both on the 
>question of overlap and technical correctness.
>
>I have my opinions on whether the overlap is gone and
>the level of correctness.
>
>The doc is in our member's area under ITU and it is the november
>6th contribution.
>
>Dr. Yu has also at my suggestion sent liasons to dot 1 
>and dot 3 given the work being done in those areas.
>
>cheers, 
>
>mike
>-- 
>Michael Takefman              tak@xxxxxxxxx
>Manager of Engineering,       Cisco Systems
>Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
>2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
>voice: 613-254-3399       cell:613-220-6991