Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports

To: "Rhett Brikovskis \(now\)" <rhett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports
From: "David V James" <dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:20:41 -0700
Cc: "Harry Peng" <hpeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rpr GroupOf Ieee" <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


All,

I did not notice the definition of how signalFail is determined
for SPI-4.1 or SPI-4.2, in either our specification or the SPI
reference documents.

Does anyone know what these should be?
Does anyone know why they are apparently not in
the RPR D2.2 specification?

DVJ


David V. James
3180 South Ct
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Home: +1.650.494.0926
      +1.650.856.9801
Cell: +1.650.954.6906
Fax:  +1.360.242.5508
Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports
  - From: Mike Takefman
- RE: [RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports
  - From: shital Desai

Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports
Next by Date: RE: [RPRWG] fairness frame format
Prev by thread: RE: [RPRWG] One question about the local add_rate
Next by thread: RE: [RPRWG] SPI-4.1 and SPI-4.2 PHY_LINK_STATUS signalFail reports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread