|
Jon,
Thanks
for your interesting work. A couple of questions (if it is not too
much..:):
Do you
have the values of the localFairRate for station 0 ? Can you make a graph that
shows how this value changes with time for the aggressive and the conservative
modes ?
Leon
Jon,
Thank you for the good work. It seems like our formulas in Annex G is off
quite a bit specially for conservative mode. Did you use the models from
AT&T? If there is no modeling error, we need to find out the root cause of
it and modify our formulas.
Thanks.
Necdet
Jon Schuringa wrote:
Yes, it is better to change only one parameter at a time. New
results with fixed 500km ring are here:http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~nthuma/simRes2.pdf Jon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:10
AM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Simulation
results Jon,
Thank you for running these simulations. These are very valuable. The
only think that is not clear to me from the result is whether the buffer
requirement is linearly increased with number of nodes or with the size of
the ring. Can you please run the same simulations for a fixed size ring
say for 500km with varying number of nodes as in your graphs? After that
we can determine whether the number of nodes affect the buffer
requirements or not and based on that we can modify the formulas if
necessary.
Thanks.
Necdet
Jon Schuringa wrote:
Dear all, I finished the simulations about the maximum
stq buffer occupancy withfixed values for stqLowThreshold
and stqHighThreshold andstqFullThreshold set to infinity, as Necdet
proposed. You can get the results here:http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~nthuma/simRes.pdf
-
Jon
|