| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Colleagues,
I will probably not be able to joint the telecon, therefore I send my comments regarding the operating rules by mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.4 Meetings and Participation
... "TAG meetings that are less than two days in duration or that take place adjunct to and co-located with the Plenary meeting do not count towards TAG voting rights."
=> Why is this included? I propose to delete this sentence (at least the part "that are less than two days in duration or").
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.4 Meetings and Participation
"Attendance at 802.19 sessions also counts as attendance in the member's home TAG subject to an agreement between the TAG chair and member's home TAG chair."
=> replace "member's home TAG" with "member's home group(s)"
=> or replace the complete sentence with:
"Attendance at 802.19 sessions also counts as attendance in the other groups, if the member is voter in that other group and subject to an agreement between the 802.19 chair and and the chair of that other group."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greetings Günter
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-stds-802-19@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-19@listserv.ieee.org] Im Auftrag von Tom Siep
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. März 2005 20:17
An: stds-802-19@IEEE.ORG
Betreff: Update of proposed rules, resend of voting addendum
Hello All,
We had a telecon this week on updating the rules for our TAG. We made
it about half way through reviewing my cut at changing it. Those things
we had agreement on were "accepted", the things we did not discuss or I
had subsequent thoughts on are still in change-bar format. We plan to
have another telecon next week and get to the "interesting bits" about
the way the TAG forms a vote on a WWG draft.
Comments via reflector in the mean time are most welcome and will help
us make better progress in the telecon.
Tom