| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Marianna,
It is my understanding that in each of the simulations both networks would be using the same scenario. So both 11y and 16h would either be in Scenario A, or Scenario B, etc.
I believe I asked a question about that at the meeting and was told that was the plan. If we want to consider simulations with each network in a different scenario that could be done, but that would add more simulations. We can always do that. We would want to decide if we want them to be mandatory or optional simulations.
Regards, Steve
From: Mariana
Goldhamer [mailto:marianna.goldhammer@alvarion.com]
Hi Paul,
We have agreed in the November meeting that in the mandatory Scenario C we will simulate:
- 802.16h - outdoor-to-indoor - 802.11y - indoor only.
The document http://ieee802.org/19/pub/2007/19-07-0011-10-0000-Parameters-for-Simulation.doc does not reflect this agreement. Please fix the document.
Regards,
Mariana From: Shellhammer,
Steve [mailto:sshellha@qualcomm.com]
All,
Marianna has produced a document on the Uplink System Gain. It is posted at,
http://ieee802.org/19/pub/2007/19-07-0026-00-0000-Up-Link-System-Gain.doc
We will discuss this when we are discussing the Link Budget.
Steve
From: Shellhammer,
Steve
All,
I have updated the agenda to include a discussion of a revised version of the Simulation parameters documents. Paul has made a number of changes. Here are the comments from Paul,
- I have added all the changes in the minutes (document 0025). - I’ve added a simplified traffic model based on an earlier suggestion in the 802.19 forum from Peter Ecclesine. I feel we also need to make a decision on the mandatory and optional aspects of traffic models. I feel the mandating of a very simple model would be a prudent move. - Added an 802.16h link budget along side the one for 802.11y. - We need to discuss the concept and come up with some numbers for the 802.16 uplink subchannelisation gain. These are highlighted text in 0011r10. I think there may be some dependency here on the coexistence metrics discussion.
Regards, Steve From: Shellhammer,
Steve
All,
We will be having a conference call on Coexistence in the 3650 MHz Frequency Band on Thursday at 11 AM Eastern Time (8 AM Pacific Time). We can discuss the coexistence metric document that I sent out during the Atlanta meeting but did not get to discuss. Paul, I think you took an action item to work on a standardized link budget to be used for both 11y and 16h. If you have anything on that we can discuss it. If anyone has any additional items for the agenda please notify me.
Agenda
TO ATTEND THE AUDIO CONFERENCE: 1. Call +1 858-845-5000 2. After the greeting press 1 to attend meeting. 3. Enter Meeting ID 80219 4. Enter Meeting Password 80219 followed by the # sign. 5. Follow the remaining prompts for recording the callers name and joining the meeting. For assistance, dial #0 at any time.
Steve
************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(190). ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(43). ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(42). ************************************************************************************ |