Re: [802.19] Minutes of the 802.19 TVWS call on August 25th.
Sorry Steve,
There was a misunderstanding. Gerald was mentioning not my minutes but
the Ranga's minutes from 15 days ago.
Sincerely yours,
Tuncer
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Shellhammer,
Steve<sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tuncer,
>
> I think you could mention that Gerald provided a more detailed comments via email after the meeting, and then add in the comments. That would be a more accurate record of what happened.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tuncer Baykas [mailto:tbaykas@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:00 PM
> To: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [802.19] Minutes of the 802.19 TVWS call on August 25th.
>
> Dear Gerald and Steve,
>
> Before doing the changes, I would like to clarify a point. According
> to my notes, Gerald's explanation during the teleconference wasn't so
> detailed.
> Are other attendees fine for adding such a long statement?
>
>
> Tuncer
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Shellhammer,
> Steve<sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Gerald,
>>
>> I am fine with the minutes being revised accordingly.
>>
>> Tuncer, thanks again for taking minutes last week. Can you make these edits that Gerald provided and create an R1 of the minutes?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gerald Chouinard [mailto:gerald.chouinard@xxxxxx]
>> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:12 AM
>> To: Shellhammer, Steve
>> Cc: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Minutes of the 802.19 TVWS call on August 25th.
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> Since the minutes of the previous call were not approved, I would like to
>> propose some clarification on what I said during the teleconference.
>>
>> The item listed at the bottom of the second page of document 19-09-0059r2
>> which currently reads:
>> "G Chounaird: 802.22 coexistence mechanisms are used on different levels.
>> This requires specific behavior to trigger these behaviors."
>>
>> should be modified to read as follows:
>>
>> "G. Chouinard: 802.22 coexistence mechanisms have been defined to operate
>> in two levels. The first level is when there is sufficient TV channels to
>> accommodate all WRAN systems. Spectrum etiquette is then used to allocate
>> different TV channels to the various WRAN systems, the first condition
>> being to avoid duplicate use of the same channel to avoid collision and the
>> second condition being to avoid that WRAN systems select the same backup to
>> avoid collision when these systems need to move channel due to presence of
>> incumbents. This is done by detecting the operation of other WRAN systems
>> before starting to operate and acquiring the list of backup channels from
>> these existing WRAN systems through the "coexistence beacon" and
>> re-deploying these backup channels with the new WRAN system coming on board
>> to avoid duplication of the first backup channel. The second level of
>> coexistence mechanism comes in when there is not enough TV channels to
>> accommodate all WRAN systems in the same area. Frame-based contention is
>> then used with information exchange through the "coexistence beacon" among
>> the WRAN cells to dynamically allocate each of the 16 frames of the
>> superframes according to the capacity need of each WRAN cell using the same
>> TV channel."
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Gerald
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tuncer Baykas, Ph.D
> Expert Researcher
>
> Ubiquitous Mobile Communication Group
>
> New Generation Wireless Communications Research Center
>
> National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
>
> 3-4 Hikarino-oka Yokosuka, 239-0847, Japan
>
--
Tuncer Baykas, Ph.D
Expert Researcher
Ubiquitous Mobile Communication Group
New Generation Wireless Communications Research Center
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
3-4 Hikarino-oka Yokosuka, 239-0847, Japan