Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.19] 802.19 Non-Transmitter Questions and Answers



Hello Stanislav,

 

I also had the chance to make a few more calls to discuss this today and now believe my answer was incorrect regarding your scenario. Please accept my amendment:

 

Q: Is the following scenario allowed?...

 

A: Yes. Assuming the TVBD confirms its desired channel with a database prior to transmitting, there is no restriction on the strategy a TVBD may employ to select the “best” channel for its situation. Specifically, innovative strategies like yours that implement a more efficient spectrum use are encouraged.

 

To help me visualize your use cases I sketched up the attached, both of which I believe are allowed.

 

Hello Chen,

 

I believe Mr. Shellhammer is correct, in that a TVBD may use any (or none) of the channels it receives from the database according to whatever strategy it may chose to implement.

 

Best regards,

Jesse Caulfield.

 

 

 

From: Stanislav Filin [mailto:sfilin@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:50 PM
To: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.19] 802.19 Non-Transmitter Questions and Answers

 

Dear Jesse,

Thank you very much for providing so many information that I believe is very important for 802.19.1.

I am trying to understand what is the difference between "network planning and management" and "coexistence management."

In my understanding, both processes include the following steps:
1. Obtain available channel list from TV Bands database or from TVBDs.
2. Analyze network demands and spectrum availability, decide on required network reconfiguration if needed. Here, network reconfiguration means TV channels to be used by particular TVBDs.
3. Send information on required reconfiguration to TVBDs. TVBDs will perform the requested/recommended reconfiguration ONLY IF it is inline with FCC rules: before reconfiguration they check TV Bands database and perform other required actions, described in FCC rules.

The only difference is whether this is one network or several networks.

Here, I assume that after some analysis within the process of "network planning and management" there will be request for some actions (change TV channel used) to TVBDs. Otherwise, maybe there is no need to do such analysis.

Please let me know your opinion and whether I am missing something.

Thank you.

Best regards, Stanislav Filin.

On 2010/10/28 11:14, Chen SUN wrote:

Hi Jesse,

 

Thank you for the clarification.

 

For the scenario you mentioned, if the transmitter gets the list of available channels directly from the authorized database, and in addition it uses the optimal frequency plan from the non-transmitter as advices to its operation in TV band, that should be allowed.

 

Please let me know if I am wrong. Thank you very much again.

 

 

Best regards

Chen SUN
-------------------------------------------------------
Ubiquitous Mobile Communications Group

National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)
YRP-1 Bldg., 3-4 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka 239-0847, Japan
Tel: +81 46-847-5062   Fax: +81 46-847-5110

Email: sun@xxxxxxxxxx   OR   csun@xxxxxxxx

 

From: Jesse Caulfield [mailto:caulfield.jesse@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:51 PM
To: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.19] 802.19 Non-Transmitter Questions and Answers

 

Following today’s call I have made a few phone calls and re-reviewed the rules. Following are my answers to some of your questions. Please know the following represents my own personal interpretations of the rules and does not represent any form of legal opinion or advice.

 

Q: May a non-transmitting entity (i.e. a computer software) query a TV Bands database and receive a channel list?

 

A: YES. This is specifically allowed and anticipated according to the text in 47 CFR 15.713(j)(iii):

 

it is acceptable for a TV bands database to distribute lists of available channels by means other than contact with TVBDs to provide list of channels for operation

 

Furthermore, there is no restriction on the information a non-transmitter may request. Specifically and for example, a non-transmitter may request a spectrum information at any location and for any time (e.g. past/present/future), as described in 47 CFR 15.715(e):

 

Database administrators may allow prospective operators  of TV bands devices to query the database and determine whether there are vacant channels at a particular location.

 

Note however that Databases are not required to provide channel lists to a non-transmitting entity.

 

Q: May a transmitting entity (e.g. fixed or mode II device) provide its channel list to a non-transmitting entity?

 

A: YES. This is not discussed in the rules, however it was anticipated that channel lists may be collected from transmitters and analyzed for network planning and management purposes.

 

Q: Is the following scenario allowed?

 

Step 1) A non-transmitter receives a channel list(s) from a Database to develop an optimal frequency plan.

Step 2) The non-transmitter sends an optimal frequency plan to a transmitter(s)

Step 3) A transmitter(s) then communicate with a Database to verify the “optimal” frequency plan is valid or that a desired frequency is available

 

A: Most likely NO. The intention is that transmitters get their channel lists exclusively and directly from an authorized Database.

 

I hope this is helpful to the discussion. Best regards,

--

Jesse Caulfield

Key Bridge Global LLC

1600 Tysons Blvd.,  Suite 450

McLean, VA 22102

 

Attachment: FilinScenario.png
Description: PNG image