Re: stds-80220-requirements: Friday July 18th Call Issues
David,
Given the number of times this call has moved at the last minute, people may not make the call. I personally can no longer make the call.
Therefore I suggest, if the original proponent of the contribution is not on the call, you leave the item in the appendix for the group discussion at the Plenary. It would be unfair to remove an item, if people can not make a call that was moved everyday and is now on the last office day before the Plenary.
Thanks for all your work and see you in San Francisco.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
Co-Vice Chair 802.20
In a message dated 7/17/2003 3:27:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, david.s.mcginniss@mail.sprint.com writes:
> There are some key issues in dispute from revision 3. They are not resolved and appear in revision 4 in the appendix if it was felt we would not reach agreement before the meeting. If they have competing items but no one has asked for removal on the exploder I am hoping we can discuss them and I can change the section before the meeting. Items requested on the exploder for removal have been removed if there was no
> contrary opinion sent as a reply.
>
>
> 1 Voice Services
> 2 System Reference Architecture
> 3 Link Budget
> 4 Spectral efficiency
> 5 Channel Bandwidths
> 6 Aggregate Data Rates Chart or Charts
> 7 Network Availability
> 8 QoS
> 9 Handoff support
>
>
>
> David S. McGinniss
> Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
> Principal Engineer II
> (630) 926-3184
> david.s.mcginniss@mail.sprint.com
>
>
>