RE: stds-80220-requirements: Friday July 18th Call Issues
Jerry
As you are aware, we are using the exploder as the main means to get
consensus on issues. We will also use the call to get consensus and if
the original contributor has issues, they can use either the exploder or
the call to make their opinions understood.
We are hoping that at the Plenary we will discuss in detail all the
issues/ opinions and use that Forum for the most contentious issues.
As far as moving the call, we have been swamped by last-minute
contributions and David has been working late hours (14+) to get
everything incorporated and as such we could not have the scheduled
call. We had asked contributors to give us notice but many ignored the
advice.
Sorry you will not be able to make the call tomorrow but hopefully we
will continue making progress.
See you in San Francisco.
Khurram
Khurram P. Sheikh
Chief Technology Advisor
Sprint- Broadband Wireless
Tel (SM): 650-513-2056
Tel(KC): 913-762-1645
Mobile: 650-906-8989
khurram.p.sheikh@mail.sprint.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry1upton@aol.com [mailto:Jerry1upton@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:20 PM
To: Mcginniss, Dave S [GMG]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: Friday July 18th Call Issues
David,
Given the number of times this call has moved at the last minute, people
may not make the call. I personally can no longer make the call.
Therefore I suggest, if the original proponent of the contribution is
not on the call, you leave the item in the appendix for the group
discussion at the Plenary. It would be unfair to remove an item, if
people can not make a call that was moved everyday and is now on the
last office day before the Plenary.
Thanks for all your work and see you in San Francisco.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
Co-Vice Chair 802.20
In a message dated 7/17/2003 3:27:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
david.s.mcginniss@mail.sprint.com writes:
> There are some key issues in dispute from revision 3. They are not
resolved and appear in revision 4 in the appendix if it was felt we
would not reach agreement before the meeting. If they have competing
items but no one has asked for removal on the exploder I am hoping we
can discuss them and I can change the section before the meeting. Items
requested on the exploder for removal have been removed if there was no
> contrary opinion sent as a reply.
>
>
> 1 Voice Services
> 2 System Reference Architecture
> 3 Link Budget
> 4 Spectral efficiency
> 5 Channel Bandwidths
> 6 Aggregate Data Rates Chart or Charts
> 7 Network Availability
> 8 QoS
> 9 Handoff support
>
>
>
> David S. McGinniss
> Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
> Principal Engineer II
> (630) 926-3184
> david.s.mcginniss@mail.sprint.com
>
>
>