Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: stds-80220-requirements: Frame Error Rate Requirement

Title: Message
Hi All -- Yes, we need a frame length.  This is why I asked what MAC layer "RLP" we intend to use.
 
Joseph Cleveland
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorenbosch Jheroen-FJD007 [mailto:J.Dorenbosch@motorola.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:31 PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Frame Error Rate Requirement

We seem to be converging.
 
However, will it not be hard to specify a maximum error rate for a frame unless we have an idea of the length of the frame or of the number of useful bits in a frame? A generic requirement could bias towards short frames.
 

Jheroen Dorenbosch

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Cleveland [mailto:JClevela@sta.samsung.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:40 PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: FW: Frame Error Rate Requirement, 4.1.10

Hi All:  It seems that some are referring to a previous re-write of 4.1.10, Frame Error Rate.  Several of the items noted were already addressed in the latest version sent on 7/24, which is attached below.  Please refer to the content in v0.2.1 so there is not wasted discussion.

Regards

Joseph Cleveland

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Joseph Cleveland 
Sent:   Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:44 PM
To:     stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject:        Frame Error Rate Requirement, 4.1.10

Hi All,

Here is a revision to the wording on section 4.1.10 based on feedback from many of you.  Thanks for the comments.
  <<frame_error_v0.2.1.rtf>>
Joseph Cleveland
Director, Systems & Standards
Wireless Systems Lab
Samsung Telecommunications America
Richardson, TX 75081
(O) 972-761-7981  (M) 214-336-8446  (F) 972-761-7909