| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Eric, So far we have had discussions on the
Section 1 and Section 2 of the Requirements document. I was hoping we would have discussions on
Section 3 in the teleconference tomorrow. I am in the process of updating the
Requirements document based on the inputs from the teleconferences. I expect to put up a revised updated
document towards the end of this week. That should still give us another week for
any additional comments through reflector before the That way hopefully we would be able to
make better progress at the plenary. Best Regards -Vivek From:
owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org]
On Behalf Of NJEDJOU Eric
FTRD/DMR/REN 802.21 Folks, Below are a couple of comments i am having on the current version of the
Req Doc i would like to share with you before tommorrow conf call Section 1 (overview) says : It does not sounds a very good idea to refer to Mobile IP, even if it is
reffered to as an example. So often in specifications, such examples end being
inconscious reference model people stick at. Why shouldn't we restrict
ourselves to saying A Higher layer mobility protocol.
What people should have in mind is that .21 will have to operate even if the
mobility management no more happen to be made at the IP layer!!! Section 2 o
The standard shall provide services to achieve judicious and optimum selection
of L2 networks prior to the handover process initiation (hints as link
utilization, quality and cost o
The standard shall provide services to timely trigger the handover process Therefore,
appropriate sub sections must be created by the editor The
following bullet should be under the layer tiggers sub section of the
architecture section. General
Eric
Njedjou
|