Re: [802.21] Reminder - updated detailed proposals due Jan 9, 2005
Vivek,
No specific issues have been brought to my attention regarding travel related
concerns for the May 2005 Interim meeting. If you know of any, please let me
know. In fact, by the end of San Antonio meeting, even though there were strong
indications that the May 2005 meeting would be held in Beijing, China, it is
only recently that the venue is being finalized.
As far as May 2005 meeting being an Interim and not Plenary is concerned, those
could be addressed at the March 2005 Plenary.
Let me know if you have any other concerns.
regards,
-ajay
On 12/13/2004 7:45 PM, Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
> I am not sure all of Ben's questions were answered clearly, so just
> restating them for clarification.
> As per Section 3 of meeting minutes in San Antonio, voting on proposals
> is expected to occur *ONLY* in Phase II, in May 2005. Given that:
> a] Is it *mandatory* for all proposers to submit an update in Jan and/or
> March meetings?
> b] Will a proposal be *NOT* considered further if an update is not
> submitted for Jan/March meetings? (for those just paranoid ..)
>
> I also have a related concern which I raised earlier on the reflector
> but got no satisfactory replies. Maybe it is not an issue. But I shall
> reiterate it again anyway.
> The May interim is currently scheduled for Beijing, China. Are there any
> travel related issues with this location and is that going to affect the
> 802.21 down selection timeline?
>
> Best Regards
> -Vivek
>
> Vivek Gupta
> Intel Corporation
> Editor, IEEE 802.21
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-
> |21@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ajay Rajkumar
> |Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 3:30 PM
> |To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> |Subject: Re: [802.21] Reminder - updated detailed proposals due Jan 9,
> 2005
> |
> |Ben,
> |
> |I agree what holidays, if you are still responding/reading this email!
> |
> |Refer to 3.1.10
> |
> |This was reiteration of what was stated during the meeting.
> |
> |-ajay
> |
> |On 12/12/2004 9:09 PM, Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming wrote:
> |> Hi!
> |>
> |> Is this update mandatory for all proposers that intend to submit a
> final
> |> proposal in May?
> |> As per the straw poll in the San Antonio meeting,
> |>
> |> "
> |> 3.1.6. How many participants are in favor of Option #3: Evaluation
> |> guideline: Jan 2005; Phase I: Mar 2005; Phase II, May 2005. (For: 25;
> |> Against: 0 Abstain: 3)
> |> "
> |>
> |> So may I ask what is the purpose of the updated proposals in light of
> |> the Phase I in March and Phase II in May?
> |>
> |> Thanks!
> |>
> |> Regards,
> |> Ben
> |>
> |> Happy Holidays(?) to all reading this... :)
> |>
> |> Ajay Rajkumar wrote:
> |>
> |>
> |>>Folks,
> |>>
> |>>As discussed and decided during the San Antonio meeting, this is just
> a
> |reminder
> |>>that the updated proposals from the proposers who had originally
> |submitted
> |>>proposals are due by January 9, 2005 (midnight EDT).
> |>>
> |>>These updated proposals are for further consideration and discussion
> by
> |the group.
> |>>
> |>>Wishing you all Season's Greetings and Happy Holidays.
> |>>
> |>>Regards,
> |>>-ajay
> |>>Chair, IEEE 802.21 WG
> |>>
> |>>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> --
> |> /<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<++>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
> |> | Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming |
> |> | R & D Engineer |
> |> | Panasonic Singapore Laboratories Pte Ltd |
> |> | Tel: (65)6550 5481 Fax: (65)6550 5459 |
> |> | E-mail: benjamin@psl.com.sg |
> |> \>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<</